Microsoft Want to rename RSS ‘Web Feeds’


Kevin Burton reports that Microsoft are looking at new names for RSS. At the moment they are calling them “web feeds” but they are open to other suggestions.

For once I think Microsoft are doing the right thing, even though the techies are up in arms about what they see as another example of Microsoft meddling. The average user doesn’t understand what RSS means and what it can actually do for them. In a recent survey Nielson found that 66% of people don’t know what RSS is and only 11% of people use RSS feeds. Forrester Research also found that only 2% of Americans use RSS feeds and Pew Internet found that 91% of Americans had no idea of what RSS was.

I have to confess that when I was first told about RSS I thought it was just for site owners to include links from other sites on their pages, not as a browsing tool. You only have to look at the effort the BBC have put into explaining what RSS is to realise how hard it is to sell to the average punter.

It hurts me to say this but I have to take my hat off to Microsoft again, as again they turning useful products into something that is accessible to the masses.


Read Related Posts




Latest Posts

Filed Under: Internet News

Tags:

About the Author: Everton is based in London and has worked in the internet and mobile space for over ten years now, and before that worked in corporate strategy and consulting. He has a degree in Economics from Cambridge University.He also writes for Windows 7 News, Windows 8 News and One Tip A Day.

  • i love the name web feeds!
  • Anonymous
    any one know what a DVD is?
    'nough said?
  • Anonymous
    I think this is a good idea. I was talking to a friend the other day and he asked what all the things were i had in thunderbird. I said RSS feeds and he looked at me blank, i said like webfeed type things and he got the idea. Now he uses them!
  • Anonymous
    By trying to change established terms, it seems very likely Microsoft are once again trying to "Embrace & Extend" an existing technology - the way they did with Java - to add Microsoft specific functionality. They want to own it.
    The RSS format is stable, recognized, and established. It doesn't need Microsoft to extend it.
    This is like Microsoft coming up and saying: we're changing our name for the CD to "Optical Disk" because we think that is more descriptive of the technology, and we'll be extending it. And by the way, future versions will only work with Microsoft supplied drivers.
  • Anonymous
    Great writeup on this topic. I have tried on numerous occassions to explain what RSS is to family and coworkers and it always ends with the person I'm explaining to having a dazed expression and a reply of "huh." To really get across what this technology is and what it can do for the average user, a new descriptor is definitely needed.
  • Anonymous
    I agree that the name of RSS should be changed. I really think in the near future RSS will be all over the place, doing all sorts of task - many of which we haven't even begun to think of yet. However, I think that the techology will be "invisible." People won't really realize or know or care that RSS is providing this or that; it just will. I'd venture to say that there's a small group of people who already use RSS without really knowing it. I've read stories about test groups reporting that they didn't know what blogs were, yet were just watched reading blogs. Same principle.
    All that aside, I'M NOT SURE I WANT MS TO COME UP WITH THE NEW NAME. See: "Vista", "XP", the use of the word "explorer" to mean multiple apps, etc.
  • Anonymous
    M$ renames RSS, feeds suddenly fill with advertising and loose their appeal...
  • Anonymous
    "RSS" is a bit too geeky for most to make an impression. Apple should have hit this one first, instead of going on with the RSS bandwagon.
  • Anonymous
    Why not call this what it orginally was? A Channel. Remember IE4 ?
    Offline reading of a website/blog/show notes and download the attachments/podcast/mp3
  • Anonymous
    I don't understand why those who know, can't teach those who don't. We are constantly seeing things change to make them more marketable. When I was young radio station were known by their call letters. WABC, WXYZ etc.
    Now they are starting to call them Mike or Frank. If people aren't picking up on something new then someone isn't doing enough to explain it.
blog comments powered by Disqus