<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMW.de Banned From Google For Using &#039;Doorway Pages&#039;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/</link>
	<description>Updated daily with the latest news, tips, tweaks, social networking, wordpress tips &#38; tweaks, windows optimization help and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:53:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Koz</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-47147</link>
		<dc:creator>Koz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siteground128.com/~connecte/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/#comment-47147</guid>
		<description>Are Ambergreen still doing this kind of thing? The links in Anonymus&#039; post are broken, is this intentional? I approve of not allowing backlinks to spammy sites!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are Ambergreen still doing this kind of thing? The links in Anonymus&#8217; post are broken, is this intentional? I approve of not allowing backlinks to spammy sites!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koz</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-219141</link>
		<dc:creator>Koz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siteground128.com/~connecte/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/#comment-219141</guid>
		<description>Are Ambergreen still doing this kind of thing? The links in Anonymus&#039; post are broken, is this intentional? I approve of not allowing backlinks to spammy sites!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are Ambergreen still doing this kind of thing? The links in Anonymus&#8217; post are broken, is this intentional? I approve of not allowing backlinks to spammy sites!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everton Blair</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-35912</link>
		<dc:creator>Everton Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siteground128.com/~connecte/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/#comment-35912</guid>
		<description>I would hope that the ban had been lifted by now given that I wrote this 9 months ago....;-).  Google only banned them for about a month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hope that the ban had been lifted by now given that I wrote this 9 months ago&#8230;.;-).  Google only banned them for about a month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everton Blair</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-219140</link>
		<dc:creator>Everton Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siteground128.com/~connecte/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/#comment-219140</guid>
		<description>I would hope that the ban had been lifted by now given that I wrote this 9 months ago....;-).  Google only banned them for about a month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hope that the ban had been lifted by now given that I wrote this 9 months ago&#8230;.;-).  Google only banned them for about a month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-35903</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siteground128.com/~connecte/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/#comment-35903</guid>
		<description>Do a search in google, they are not banned at all.

site:bmw.de</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do a search in google, they are not banned at all.</p>
<p>site:bmw.de</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-219139</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siteground128.com/~connecte/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/#comment-219139</guid>
		<description>Do a search in google, they are not banned at all.

site:bmw.de</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do a search in google, they are not banned at all.</p>
<p>site:bmw.de</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everton Blair</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Everton Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 20:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siteground128.com/~connecte/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/#comment-554</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve turned Javascript off - what exactly am I looking for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve turned Javascript off &#8211; what exactly am I looking for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everton Blair</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-219138</link>
		<dc:creator>Everton Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siteground128.com/~connecte/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/#comment-219138</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve turned Javascript off - what exactly am I looking for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve turned Javascript off &#8211; what exactly am I looking for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siteground128.com/~connecte/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/#comment-553</guid>
		<description>BMW aren&#039;t the only one&#039;s doing this kind of thing. Google should look at the client list of AmberGreen in the UK as they&#039;ve been doing this for years. It&#039;s lazy, irresponsible and their clients should be in uproar. Take a look at the following homepages with JavaScript turned off and you&#039;ll see what I mean - www.boots.com, www.mytravel.com, www.thomascook.com, www.virgincosmetics.co.uk, www.thewhitecompany.com, www.bradford-bingley.co.uk, etc, etc. The list is endless. Google needs to continue to make examples of companies and SEO agencies such as Ambergreen if this is going to stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BMW aren&#39;t the only one&#39;s doing this kind of thing. Google should look at the client list of AmberGreen in the UK as they&#39;ve been doing this for years. It&#39;s lazy, irresponsible and their clients should be in uproar. Take a look at the following homepages with JavaScript turned off and you&#39;ll see what I mean &#8211; <a href="http://www.boots.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.boots.com</a>, <a href="http://www.mytravel.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mytravel.com</a>, <a href="http://www.thomascook.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thomascook.com</a>, <a href="http://www.virgincosmetics.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.virgincosmetics.co.uk</a>, <a href="http://www.thewhitecompany.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thewhitecompany.com</a>, <a href="http://www.bradford-bingley.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.bradford-bingley.co.uk</a>, etc, etc. The list is endless. Google needs to continue to make examples of companies and SEO agencies such as Ambergreen if this is going to stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-219137</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siteground128.com/~connecte/2006/02/05/bmwde-banned-from-google-for-using-doorway-pages/#comment-219137</guid>
		<description>BMW aren&#039;t the only one&#039;s doing this kind of thing. Google should look at the client list of AmberGreen in the UK as they&#039;ve been doing this for years. It&#039;s lazy, irresponsible and their clients should be in uproar. Take a look at the following homepages with JavaScript turned off and you&#039;ll see what I mean - www.boots.com, www.mytravel.com, www.thomascook.com, www.virgincosmetics.co.uk, www.thewhitecompany.com, www.bradford-bingley.co.uk, etc, etc. The list is endless. Google needs to continue to make examples of companies and SEO agencies such as Ambergreen if this is going to stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BMW aren&#039;t the only one&#039;s doing this kind of thing. Google should look at the client list of AmberGreen in the UK as they&#039;ve been doing this for years. It&#039;s lazy, irresponsible and their clients should be in uproar. Take a look at the following homepages with JavaScript turned off and you&#039;ll see what I mean &#8211; <a href="http://www.boots.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.boots.com</a>, <a href="http://www.mytravel.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mytravel.com</a>, <a href="http://www.thomascook.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thomascook.com</a>, <a href="http://www.virgincosmetics.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.virgincosmetics.co.uk</a>, <a href="http://www.thewhitecompany.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thewhitecompany.com</a>, <a href="http://www.bradford-bingley.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.bradford-bingley.co.uk</a>, etc, etc. The list is endless. Google needs to continue to make examples of companies and SEO agencies such as Ambergreen if this is going to stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 1/16 queries in 0.007 seconds using apc
Object Caching 495/500 objects using apc

Served from: www.connectedinternet.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 19:27:03 -->
