Installing Vista RC2 As My Main OS Was Definitely A Bad Idea


My decision to install Windows Vista RC2 as my main OS last week was a very bad idea. Yes, I know I should have known better but I thought it was time to force myself to give Vista a real tryout.

The installation of Vista itself went almost without a hitch. The only problem I had was trying to get it to recognise my 4GB of ram, but I think my crappy A8R-MVP motherboard was causing the problem not the 64-bit version of Vista.

The real issues began once I had to install my hardware and software. There were far too many incompatabilities. Some were flagged by Vista during the installation process, others only became apparent once I attempted to use installed programs. After half a day of frustration I gave up and restored Windows XP.

I know that Microsoft can’t be held accountable for 3rd-party software not working, but the fact that I couldn’t get my programs to work properly made me realise a key thing about my PC - the programs I use are much more important to me than the OS itself. XP allows me to run all the programs I want to run, whereas it is going to take a long time for Vista to allow me to do this.

Vista itself may be very sexy and fast (on my machine anyway), but I really don’t think I’m going to be upgrading to Vista until at least a year after it comes out in order to give software developers time to catchup.

Bookmark & Share

Related Posts

About the Author

author photo

Everton is based in London and has worked in the internet and mobile space for over ten years now, and before that worked in corporate strategy and consulting. He has a degree in Economics from Cambridge University, and currently runs the Portal and online operations for one of the largest ISPs in the UK. He also writes for Windows 7 News.

See All Posts by This Author

There Is 1 Response So Far. »

  1. #1

    I was unable to load either the initial beta program nor the RC2. I have a relatively powerful desktop Presario with a P4 3.06G speed processor, 2GB RAM, 200GB memory and a score of bells & whistles (including both CDROM and DVD burner drives. Vista would hiccup during file extraction and die to a blue screen. I tried to load it on my Compaq laptop (specially beefed up to meet Vista’s opening bid) and the LT whizzed past where to 800lb primate fell on its face - and got to the cleanup post-install. . .and crashed. It took me a long time to deinstall my Norton programs (as indicated I should in the Vista “see if your PC can hack it” routine) and a midnight to dawn “almost install” to raise my hopes the LT install would succeed. I was on the horn to HP and Microsoft several times, sent a huge log file to MS, but we never came to a conclusion why neither computer was incapable of loading Vista. HP’s tech, somewhere in Mumbai or Nova Scotia, opined my desktop motherboard was not designed to accept Vista. The LT failure remains a mystery.
    My question now is: will the retail Vista OS fail on my computers?

Subscribe without commenting

Post a Response


Comment Policy: Any comments are permitted only because the site owner is letting you post, and any comments could be removed for any reason at the absolute discretion of the site owner.
  • Subscribe Now!

    subscribe to my feed subscribe to my feed
    1 - What is RSS?
    2 - Or, signup & receive updates by email!
  • www.checkcost.co.uk

    Read Reviews & Compare

    Computer

    Laptops

    Printer

    MP3 Players

    Compare Prices

  • Polls

    Which Mobile OS Will Be The Winner in 2009?






    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • RSS Windows 7 News

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • Meta