<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Clears Up Images Near Adsense Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/</link>
	<description>Updated daily with the latest news, tips, tweaks, social networking, wordpress tips &#38; tweaks, windows optimization help and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 02:52:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: tony greene</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-2/#comment-47307</link>
		<dc:creator>tony greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47307</guid>
		<description>This seems to have been the bane of many a webmaster that seemed to need &quot;G&quot;&#039;s PPC program for revenue. Obviously there is a problem with what &quot;G&quot; did to past advertisers&#039;. My question is, will all the banned accounts dure to image infractions be asked to come back to &quot;G&quot;&#039;s service? I&#039;ll wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to have been the bane of many a webmaster that seemed to need &#8220;G&#8221;&#8216;s PPC program for revenue. Obviously there is a problem with what &#8220;G&#8221; did to past advertisers&#8217;. My question is, will all the banned accounts dure to image infractions be asked to come back to &#8220;G&#8221;&#8216;s service? I&#8217;ll wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony greene</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-2/#comment-219897</link>
		<dc:creator>tony greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-219897</guid>
		<description>This seems to have been the bane of many a webmaster that seemed to need &quot;G&quot;&#039;s PPC program for revenue. Obviously there is a problem with what &quot;G&quot; did to past advertisers&#039;. My question is, will all the banned accounts dure to image infractions be asked to come back to &quot;G&quot;&#039;s service? I&#039;ll wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to have been the bane of many a webmaster that seemed to need &#8220;G&#8221;&#8216;s PPC program for revenue. Obviously there is a problem with what &#8220;G&#8221; did to past advertisers&#8217;. My question is, will all the banned accounts dure to image infractions be asked to come back to &#8220;G&#8221;&#8216;s service? I&#8217;ll wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chambross</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-2/#comment-47298</link>
		<dc:creator>chambross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47298</guid>
		<description>I think most of us don&#039;t really understand what&#039;s going on...
I mean based on the recent clarification made by Google...

They allowed us to put pictures together with adsense BUT with conditions...

Read again the latest issue from Google and we&#039;ll see the truth! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most of us don&#8217;t really understand what&#8217;s going on&#8230;<br />
I mean based on the recent clarification made by Google&#8230;</p>
<p>They allowed us to put pictures together with adsense BUT with conditions&#8230;</p>
<p>Read again the latest issue from Google and we&#8217;ll see the truth! <img src="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?6dc32e" alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chambross</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-2/#comment-219896</link>
		<dc:creator>chambross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-219896</guid>
		<description>I think most of us don&#039;t really understand what&#039;s going on...
I mean based on the recent clarification made by Google...

They allowed us to put pictures together with adsense BUT with conditions...

Read again the latest issue from Google and we&#039;ll see the truth! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most of us don&#8217;t really understand what&#8217;s going on&#8230;<br />
I mean based on the recent clarification made by Google&#8230;</p>
<p>They allowed us to put pictures together with adsense BUT with conditions&#8230;</p>
<p>Read again the latest issue from Google and we&#8217;ll see the truth! <img src="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?6dc32e" alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arpit</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-47289</link>
		<dc:creator>Arpit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47289</guid>
		<description>sir i have added your blog in my technocrati fav.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sir i have added your blog in my technocrati fav.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arpit</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-219895</link>
		<dc:creator>Arpit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-219895</guid>
		<description>sir i have added your blog in my technocrati fav.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sir i have added your blog in my technocrati fav.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everton Blair</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-47288</link>
		<dc:creator>Everton Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47288</guid>
		<description>you first arpit.... nah, just kidding!  I&#039;ve added you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you first arpit&#8230;. nah, just kidding!  I&#8217;ve added you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everton Blair</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-219894</link>
		<dc:creator>Everton Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-219894</guid>
		<description>you first arpit.... nah, just kidding!  I&#039;ve added you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you first arpit&#8230;. nah, just kidding!  I&#8217;ve added you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arpit</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-47286</link>
		<dc:creator>Arpit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47286</guid>
		<description>hello came to your blog thru JohnTP blog..
you seems to be intersted in technorati fav exchange.
Can we exchange technocarti fav?
If yes, add my blog to your technocrati fav and drop a msg on my blog, and i will add you in my technocrati fav
Thanks
Arpit
http://technicalbliss.blogspot.com

my technocrati username is arpitagarwal82</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello came to your blog thru JohnTP blog..<br />
you seems to be intersted in technorati fav exchange.<br />
Can we exchange technocarti fav?<br />
If yes, add my blog to your technocrati fav and drop a msg on my blog, and i will add you in my technocrati fav<br />
Thanks<br />
Arpit<br />
<a href="http://technicalbliss.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://technicalbliss.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>my technocrati username is arpitagarwal82</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arpit</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-219893</link>
		<dc:creator>Arpit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-219893</guid>
		<description>hello came to your blog thru JohnTP blog..
you seems to be intersted in technorati fav exchange.
Can we exchange technocarti fav?
If yes, add my blog to your technocrati fav and drop a msg on my blog, and i will add you in my technocrati fav
Thanks
Arpit
http://technicalbliss.blogspot.com

my technocrati username is arpitagarwal82</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello came to your blog thru JohnTP blog..<br />
you seems to be intersted in technorati fav exchange.<br />
Can we exchange technocarti fav?<br />
If yes, add my blog to your technocrati fav and drop a msg on my blog, and i will add you in my technocrati fav<br />
Thanks<br />
Arpit<br />
<a href="http://technicalbliss.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://technicalbliss.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>my technocrati username is arpitagarwal82</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-47284</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47284</guid>
		<description>I was planing on using Adsense Beautifier for this, but that is definitely out.

i can understand the sudden policy reversal by Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was planing on using Adsense Beautifier for this, but that is definitely out.</p>
<p>i can understand the sudden policy reversal by Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-219892</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-219892</guid>
		<description>I was planing on using Adsense Beautifier for this, but that is definitely out.

i can understand the sudden policy reversal by Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was planing on using Adsense Beautifier for this, but that is definitely out.</p>
<p>i can understand the sudden policy reversal by Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adsense Income Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-47259</link>
		<dc:creator>Adsense Income Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47259</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting that image with your post.  That clears up the question that I was asking at my blog.  I suppose when it comes to pictures like that, it would realy increase clicks.  I see why Google is worried about inflated ad costs for their Adwords subscribers.

Keep up the good blogging!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting that image with your post.  That clears up the question that I was asking at my blog.  I suppose when it comes to pictures like that, it would realy increase clicks.  I see why Google is worried about inflated ad costs for their Adwords subscribers.</p>
<p>Keep up the good blogging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adsense Income Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-219891</link>
		<dc:creator>Adsense Income Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-219891</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting that image with your post.  That clears up the question that I was asking at my blog.  I suppose when it comes to pictures like that, it would realy increase clicks.  I see why Google is worried about inflated ad costs for their Adwords subscribers.

Keep up the good blogging!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting that image with your post.  That clears up the question that I was asking at my blog.  I suppose when it comes to pictures like that, it would realy increase clicks.  I see why Google is worried about inflated ad costs for their Adwords subscribers.</p>
<p>Keep up the good blogging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 1/20 queries in 0.009 seconds using apc
Object Caching 568/580 objects using apc

Served from: www.connectedinternet.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 18:14:55 -->
