<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google Clears Up Images Near Adsense Ads</title> <atom:link href="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/</link> <description>The latest tech, mobile and gaming news</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: A Bowl of Stupid &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Clearing Up Some Issues - Part I</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-47362</link> <dc:creator>A Bowl of Stupid &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Clearing Up Some Issues - Part I</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 03:25:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47362</guid> <description>[...] To start it off, I came across this link clarifying GoogleÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s recent decision to disallow the placement of images next to Adsense ads to increase clickthrough rates. In short - they donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t want it. The remainder of the explanation is here and here. Good to know, considering my friend, who has been in the industry for years, was himself unclear about the issue. Thanks, although I think Google&#039;s reasoning is a bit silly. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To start it off, I came across this link clarifying GoogleÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s recent decision to disallow the placement of images next to Adsense ads to increase clickthrough rates. In short &#8211; they donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t want it. The remainder of the explanation is here and here. Good to know, considering my friend, who has been in the industry for years, was himself unclear about the issue. Thanks, although I think Google&#8217;s reasoning is a bit silly. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tony greene</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-47307</link> <dc:creator>tony greene</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:28:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47307</guid> <description>This seems to have been the bane of many a webmaster that seemed to need &quot;G&quot;&#039;s PPC program for revenue. Obviously there is a problem with what &quot;G&quot; did to past advertisers&#039;. My question is, will all the banned accounts dure to image infractions be asked to come back to &quot;G&quot;&#039;s service? I&#039;ll wait and see.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to have been the bane of many a webmaster that seemed to need &#8220;G&#8221;&#8217;s PPC program for revenue. Obviously there is a problem with what &#8220;G&#8221; did to past advertisers&#8217;. My question is, will all the banned accounts dure to image infractions be asked to come back to &#8220;G&#8221;&#8217;s service? I&#8217;ll wait and see.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chambross</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-47298</link> <dc:creator>chambross</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:57:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47298</guid> <description>I think most of us don&#039;t really understand what&#039;s going on... I mean based on the recent clarification made by Google...They allowed us to put pictures together with adsense BUT with conditions...Read again the latest issue from Google and we&#039;ll see the truth! :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most of us don&#8217;t really understand what&#8217;s going on&#8230;<br /> I mean based on the recent clarification made by Google&#8230;</p><p>They allowed us to put pictures together with adsense BUT with conditions&#8230;</p><p>Read again the latest issue from Google and we&#8217;ll see the truth! :-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Arpit</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-47289</link> <dc:creator>Arpit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:28:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47289</guid> <description>sir i have added your blog in my technocrati fav.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sir i have added your blog in my technocrati fav.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Everton Blair</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-47288</link> <dc:creator>Everton Blair</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:24:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47288</guid> <description>you first arpit.... nah, just kidding!  I&#039;ve added you</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you first arpit&#8230;. nah, just kidding!  I&#8217;ve added you</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Arpit</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-47286</link> <dc:creator>Arpit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:09:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47286</guid> <description>hello came to your blog thru JohnTP blog.. you seems to be intersted in technorati fav exchange. Can we exchange technocarti fav? If yes, add my blog to your technocrati fav and drop a msg on my blog, and i will add you in my technocrati fav Thanks Arpit http://technicalbliss.blogspot.commy technocrati username is arpitagarwal82</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello came to your blog thru JohnTP blog..<br /> you seems to be intersted in technorati fav exchange.<br /> Can we exchange technocarti fav?<br /> If yes, add my blog to your technocrati fav and drop a msg on my blog, and i will add you in my technocrati fav<br /> Thanks<br /> Arpit<br /> <a href="http://technicalbliss.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://technicalbliss.blogspot.com</a></p><p>my technocrati username is arpitagarwal82</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ajay</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-47284</link> <dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:53:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47284</guid> <description>I was planing on using Adsense Beautifier for this, but that is definitely out.i can understand the sudden policy reversal by Google.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was planing on using Adsense Beautifier for this, but that is definitely out.</p><p>i can understand the sudden policy reversal by Google.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adsense Income Blog</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/google-clears-up-images-near-adsense-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-47259</link> <dc:creator>Adsense Income Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:04:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2006/12/20/1211/#comment-47259</guid> <description>Thanks for posting that image with your post.  That clears up the question that I was asking at my blog.  I suppose when it comes to pictures like that, it would realy increase clicks.  I see why Google is worried about inflated ad costs for their Adwords subscribers.Keep up the good blogging!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting that image with your post.  That clears up the question that I was asking at my blog.  I suppose when it comes to pictures like that, it would realy increase clicks.  I see why Google is worried about inflated ad costs for their Adwords subscribers.</p><p>Keep up the good blogging!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/18 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn2.connectedinternet.co.uk

Served from: www.connectedinternet.co.uk @ 2010-03-21 22:58:13 -->