<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail Loses Trademark Battle In Europe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/gmail-loses-trademark-battle-in-europe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/gmail-loses-trademark-battle-in-europe/</link>
	<description>Updated daily with the latest news, tips, tweaks, social networking, wordpress tips &#38; tweaks, windows optimization help and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Enblogopedia</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/gmail-loses-trademark-battle-in-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-52758</link>
		<dc:creator>Enblogopedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/1447/#comment-52758</guid>
		<description>Google pays only $250,000!!!!
Hmmm I think google should use Adsense it self :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google pays only $250,000!!!!<br />
Hmmm I think google should use Adsense it self <img src="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif?6dc32e" alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enblogopedia</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/gmail-loses-trademark-battle-in-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-220503</link>
		<dc:creator>Enblogopedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/1447/#comment-220503</guid>
		<description>Google pays only $250,000!!!!
Hmmm I think google should use Adsense it self :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google pays only $250,000!!!!<br />
Hmmm I think google should use Adsense it self <img src="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif?6dc32e" alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everton</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/gmail-loses-trademark-battle-in-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-52749</link>
		<dc:creator>Everton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 20:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/1447/#comment-52749</guid>
		<description>#Zigire

Google have been fighting over the gmail.com domain for a long time, and where using googlemail.com while the courtcase rumbled on.  Now they have to permanently 

#vincent 

In the US yes, but not in Europe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#Zigire</p>
<p>Google have been fighting over the gmail.com domain for a long time, and where using googlemail.com while the courtcase rumbled on.  Now they have to permanently </p>
<p>#vincent </p>
<p>In the US yes, but not in Europe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everton</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/gmail-loses-trademark-battle-in-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-220502</link>
		<dc:creator>Everton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/1447/#comment-220502</guid>
		<description>#Zigire

Google have been fighting over the gmail.com domain for a long time, and where using googlemail.com while the courtcase rumbled on.  Now they have to permanently 

#vincent 

In the US yes, but not in Europe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#Zigire</p>
<p>Google have been fighting over the gmail.com domain for a long time, and where using googlemail.com while the courtcase rumbled on.  Now they have to permanently </p>
<p>#vincent </p>
<p>In the US yes, but not in Europe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/gmail-loses-trademark-battle-in-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-52687</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 02:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/1447/#comment-52687</guid>
		<description>How about the domain Gmail.com? Will it stay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the domain Gmail.com? Will it stay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vincentchow</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/gmail-loses-trademark-battle-in-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-220501</link>
		<dc:creator>vincentchow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 02:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/1447/#comment-220501</guid>
		<description>How about the domain Gmail.com? Will it stay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the domain Gmail.com? Will it stay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zigire</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/gmail-loses-trademark-battle-in-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-52685</link>
		<dc:creator>Zigire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 01:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/1447/#comment-52685</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if this is relevant but when I signed up for GMail a year ago (I was a late invite getter, although saying that, I never tried to get one) they informed me my email was whatever(nothardtoguess)@googlemail.com rather than thesame@gmail.com. Clearly both work (@gmail and @googlemail.com) - but is that thinking ahead on Google&#039;s part based upon my location or not??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if this is relevant but when I signed up for GMail a year ago (I was a late invite getter, although saying that, I never tried to get one) they informed me my email was whatever(nothardtoguess)@googlemail.com rather than <a href="mailto:thesame@gmail.com">thesame@gmail.com</a>. Clearly both work (@gmail and @googlemail.com) &#8211; but is that thinking ahead on Google&#8217;s part based upon my location or not??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zigire</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/gmail-loses-trademark-battle-in-europe/comment-page-1/#comment-220500</link>
		<dc:creator>Zigire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/02/03/1447/#comment-220500</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if this is relevant but when I signed up for GMail a year ago (I was a late invite getter, although saying that, I never tried to get one) they informed me my email was whatever(nothardtoguess)@googlemail.com rather than thesame@gmail.com. Clearly both work (@gmail and @googlemail.com) - but is that thinking ahead on Google&#039;s part based upon my location or not??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if this is relevant but when I signed up for GMail a year ago (I was a late invite getter, although saying that, I never tried to get one) they informed me my email was whatever(nothardtoguess)@googlemail.com rather than <a href="mailto:thesame@gmail.com">thesame@gmail.com</a>. Clearly both work (@gmail and @googlemail.com) &#8211; but is that thinking ahead on Google&#8217;s part based upon my location or not??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 2/16 queries in 0.007 seconds using apc
Object Caching 406/490 objects using apc

Served from: www.connectedinternet.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 17:55:48 -->
