Comments on: PS3 Vs Xbox 360: Which Has Better Graphics?

By: 007_E

007_E — Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:15:21 +0000

its alway going to be biased. As it people opinions not facts

By: john

john — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:53:18 +0000

i have both of the systems.both xbox 360 and ps3 are 1080p so there’s no difference, but xbox 360’s graphics are more detailed.

By: Pete Thompson

Pete Thompson — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 13:30:44 +0000

Last word.

By: lars

lars — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 08:24:55 +0000

@anythingbutsony

thx for making a name that already says your talking shit. the ps3 uses cell power and blu-ray, the disc can store 3 times more than an xbox cd, so more details. and even if the xbox 360 has more gpu power, that doesnt make better grapichs. it just makes the gpu overheat. the ps3 has way better lightning effect anyway, and only a few xbox 360 games run on 1080p

By: 5 Tips To Finding A Reliable Xbox 360 Repair Service « Wicked Blogging

5 Tips To Finding A Reliable Xbox 360 Repair Service « Wicked Blogging — Sat, 01 Aug 2009 08:52:08 +0000

[...] PS3 Vs Xbox 360: Which Has Better Graphics? | Connected Internet [...]

By: Kaden101

Kaden101 — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:36:56 +0000

Pete,

Who is TheTjalian guy. Looked on Google, & it just sounds like some guy on Youtube. Obviously the worlds technical frontrunner & most reliable source ever.

For all your technical talk you missed the simplest of points. If the 360 is easier to program for, & therefore easier to get the most out of, & it’s been out longer than the PS3 which is apparently a bitch to program for, then explain Killzone 2. Explain Uncharted 2 (multiplayer beta is already out there). Explain the upcoming Heavy Rain. Explain the upcoming God of War III, & the upcoming (eventually) GT5. Whilst Forza 3 & Alan Wake do look awesome, all of the media are saying that PS3 exclusives (out & upcoming) are looking better than 360 exclusives. Why is that with all of the PS3’s difficulties & technical limitations (according to TheTjalian).

The controller is not terrible, you just don’t like it. I tried the 360 controller yesterday on a PC, & apart from the left analogue being in a different place, & a slightly different case shape, it’s just a controller, & feels very simliar to the DS3. It is personal preference like you stated in your previous post, but you obviously don’t believe that & it really was just the token gesture I thought it was to try & make you not sound like a fanboy. Whoops.

The Arcade – you still had to go get a hard drive though didn’t you? & not everybody who’s got a 360 will be able to get a cheap drive off ebay.

Natal – are you phsycic. It doesn’t matter what technology is inside it – that makes no difference to sales. Look at the Wii, which has the weakest hardware & sells like crazy. Natal might be awesome, & might sell well, but you don’t know that & neither do I. It does depend a lot on how Microsoft market it, & how it’s boxed with the console. I’m not saying it will flop, I’m just saying it could.

Killzone 2 – this article is about graphics. Killzone 2 is graphically the best full console game out there, but Uncharted 2 is suppose to be better, & the multiplayer beta is already out there. Guess it’s not a one off then. Is it just a 2 off, & will the number be adjusted up accordingly when GT5, GoWIII, Heavy Rain & I forgot The Last Guardian above. Can you have a 6 off?

The difference in most multiplatform games is nitpicking. The ports that ended up on the PS3 used to be bad so if all your bothered about is older games then yes, you’ll be dissapointed. Most newer games are pretty much identical, which means the that PS3 ports have been getting better & better all the time.

The Dreamcast wasn’t more powerful than the PS2, not by a long shot. It was a lot more powerful than the PS1 which is the market it was dropped into. It was the superior PS2 coming out that killed Sega’s impressive little console.

The differences between the 2 are marginal, & the 360’s online may well be superior…at a price.

I understand you’re car analogy, but using a Honda is a bad choice (they’re Japanese & therefore reliable). If we forgot that however, I bet the BMW is still a nicer place to sit.

It all depends on what you like, but this article is about graphics.

By: Pete Thompson

Pete Thompson — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:39:53 +0000

Not entirely true on point 1 – read the reasoning below:

It’s a technical limitation. They just don’t have enough memory to load every piece of downloadable content. They tried it, did some work-arounds, but the performance isn’t there. They hope to have some, but they’re going to have some, but they’re going to have to pick and choose…

But since the Xbox 360 and the PS3 both have 512 MB of memory, PS3 people have been saying that there is no difference. Apparently there is. According to TheTjalian, the PS3 has 512 MB of memory, but it’s divided into two: 256 MB for the system, 256 MB reserved for textures. The 360, in contrast, uses around 350 MB or more for textures and the rest for the system – however there is no system-imposed limit.

It seems that the same technologies that makes the PS3 stand out is the same reason it’s not performing well. Hint? Two words: CELL, RSX. In an investigation by hardware gurus at Anandtech, they had something to say:

The downside to the RSX using the Cell for all vertex processing is pretty significant. Remember that the RSX only has a 22.4GB/s link to its local memory bandwidth, which is less than 60% of the memory bandwidth of the GeForce 7800 GTX. In other words, it needs that additional memory bandwidth from the Cell’s memory controller to be able to handle more texture-bound games.

Yikes! So even while the RSX G70 monster inside the PS3 is better than a GF 7800 GTX, it can’t quite give its all to the system. It’s like getting an elephant through a crevice – okay, okay, not that an elephant would make a great video card and all. And the Xbox 360 is not without it’s own hiccups and mishaps. And the PS3 does perform on par with the 360, even with the limitations considered.

Point 2 – the controller is terrible – the analogue is too loose, in the wrong place. Just laziness and ignorance on sonys part, they were going to re-do the whole thing but failed, again, to get their butt in gear.

Point 6 – no serious gamer? I got the arcade, then bought a drive on ebay for £20 – saved some cash. It IS required to enjoy the 360 but doesnt mean the arcade is useless.
If it wasnt for the demos i wanted to play I wouldnt have got a hd, glad i dont have to worry and its nice saving games tot he hard drive.

Point 7 – Natal wont flop – its a high def camera unit that will come into the control systems in most if not all games, and expands the limitations of working through control pads – kick ups in soccer, buzzing in quiz games, using your couch as a driving chair, its brilliant and what made the wii a hit.

Unfortunately, killzone 2, regardless of the graphics, isnt a good enough game to convert anyone to ditch their 360’s or convince those ont he fence to buy a ps3 over 360, it has too many flaws…. good but play through a second time after the excitement and the reviews state there are a lot of things wrong with it. It’s also a one off, even if you do think its the best game ever, 90% of the market are ports, which ports better? 360 Im afraid, which in relative terms means the graphics are going to be better more of the time. Not much in it but again, doesnt justify the ps3, just makes them equal – but one for more cash.
Dreamcast was more powerful the the ps2, saturn was better than the ps1, but it doesnt make the console, its the ammount of homes it gets into that matters – wii perfect example (although id never buy one now as the graphics are just too dated for my liking).

Id love the ps3 to be soo much better, because Im already getting over critical of the graphics on both (no longer wowed) but it doesnt make any logical sense to me when 360s are so much cheaper and do the same job with better online facilities and I can play almost anyone i know whs into games (some pc owners too on some games), my profile is for life and will go with me with all my achievements etc to the next console.

To me its the same as saying heres a bmw with 0-60 of 8.6, top speed of 150, and heres an Honda 0-60 in 8.4 but top speed of 147 but its 10 grand cheaper. BMWs still sell, but I couldn’t justify one!

By: Kaden101

Kaden101 — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:21:51 +0000

Pete,

A few things to point out.

1. The PS3 has 512MB RAM just like the 360. The difference is that it’s shared on the 360 & it’s split 256 cell/256 GPU on the PS3. Until quite recently 256MB RAM on a PC GPU was a very respectable amount, it’s only in the past 12-18 months it’s gone GPU RAM bonkers on PC’s. The GPU RAM on the PS3 & the 360 run at 700mhz so they’re exactly the same (the actual GPU chip is quicker on the PS3). The 256MB on the cell runs at 3.2ghz, that’s over 4 & a half times faster than the RAM on the 360 so it’s got a lot more throughput. Also the cell handles a lot of the graphics processing so it does a good job of supplementing the GPU if it’s programmed for correctly. Yes the GPU on it’s own merit isn’t a good as the 360’s due to the 360’s GPU architecture, but the PS3 is well documented as being not normal to program for.

2. As pointed out above, it’s different to program for than a 360 or PC. The likes of Guerilla have pointed out that it’s not actually more difficult. It’s just a big learning curve.

3. Online play. I have no problem admitting that the 360’s online is better. You pay for it. It should be better.

4. The PS3 has a terrible controller – in your opinion. In my opinion there’s absolutely nothing wrong with the DS3. I can use it for hours without any problems. Sixaxis can be good if used properly. It’s perfect for the likes of Flower which is a damn good game, if a little different. You state at the end that it’s personal preference (token diplomatic gesture to make you sound like you’re not a 360 fanboy), & yet make your points like they’re fact.

5. Agreed that multiplatform games are often superior on the 360, but apart from the odd exception the differences are usually just nitpicking.

6. No serious gamer would choose the cheapest 360 Arcade. The hard drive is invaluable for shutting up that noisy DVD drive, & save games, & Arcade/demo/trailer downloads. You’d just end up regretting buying it & having to fork out extra for Microsofts overpriced hard drive.

7. Natal – all we’ve seen is Microsofts press demo. Just like Sonys motion controller it could end up being a complete flop. We don’t know how accurate Natal is yet. It may be awesome, but only time will tell on that. Personally I like having a controller. As you’d put it…personal preference.

8. I like Blu-Ray. It holds more data, & I can play hi-def movies. Games like MGS4 & Killzone 2 have already used that extra 41GB storage, & Killzone 2 has proved that you don’t need an install if done properly. Install’s aren’t that big a deal anyway. 360 owners always slagged off the installs on PS3, but when it’s an option on the 360 it’s wonderful .. strange that.

9. I’m not going into the amount of 360’s that have broken down. I bet even Microsoft has lost count. Yeah, yeah 3 year warranty, blah blah blah. Heard it all before.

10. The PS3 has already overtaken the 360 on graphics on exclusives. KZ2, MGS4, Uncharted 2 multiplayer beta demo is out there now. With GT5, Heavy Rain, the full Uncharted 2, & God of War III on the way things are looking good. I will say that both Alan Wake & Forza 3 do look awesome.

11. Wii 2 – why would Nintendo replace a console that is making a massive profit for them, & still selling faster than the other 2? Microsoft & Sony have also stated that they won’t be bringing out new consoles for years. Sorry.

13. Sony already make a loss on every unit, & since it’s release it’s been selling at pretty much the same rate as the 360. Considering the price difference, that’s not bad going. Oh, & don’t quote American sales figures to me. America is not the world. The only thing Microsoft beat Sony to is getting their product out first at the cost of quality control.

I’m not suggesting for second that the 360 is a bad console (apart from the shoddy built quality), & graphically the PS3 & 360 are very close at the moment, but when almost every review of KZ2 states “the best graphics of any console game” I don’t know how you can say the 360 is graphically superior. Or is every website biased in favour of the PS3? …. yeah, like anyone will believe that.

By: Pete Thompson

Pete Thompson — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:29:14 +0000

I dont understand where everyone gets this ‘ps3 power’ hype from! It is not more powerful except in the number crunching area (ie. rainfall) but it is now a known fact Sony rushed towards the end of the development, so ended up with a slow bus speed, unfinished nvidia graphics card and doesnt have enough ram in it to unleash the cores at the same time. Xbox can actually win int he power department right now, especialy frame rates which are important to me.
At the end of the day its whoever has the better developers, and as the developers get a lovely big dev pack with full instructions and familiarity, Sony give out what can only be described as a song sheet and a system thats really difficult to program to do the simple things on a 360.
Online play – 360 wins hands down – yes you need to pay, but shop around and you can get a year for £24, and you pay for a good reason because its superior and the uptime is 99.9%
Controls – the ps3 has the terrible ps2 controller, and the ps3 6-axis is a real joke. 360 is confortable and allows play for hours on end. Personal preference.
So, everyones got an xbox, because theyre cheap so all your friends are online, you get every game thats multi-port (and usually the best version due to development advantages), you get a classier box with the ps3, and if you want blu-ray (who needs it yet?) then ps3 is a cheap option to get on to that bandwagon.
Moving forward, have you seen the new xbox controller? There isnt one! YOU are the controller – we’re talking a small scanner with cams which project your image on screen, and maps your lounge so you can drive an F1 car and change gear by moving you arm in a gear-change motion – it will be easy to program for so there will be a hgh take up of compatible titles. This overtakes the Wii, by thinking outside the box. Nintendo will upgrade their controlle rbut still flapping white ipod style cables around. Sony’s response? Well, what can only be described as a stick with a bobble on the end that you wave around like a wireless wii remote.. hmm.
And back to price, you can get a 360 from £120, cheapest ps3 is still over £240.
Futureproofing is pointless, 360 will be supported if demand is there, the previous xbox didnt have that consumer demand so support was dropped, Sony kept providing ps2 support because it was stil selling by the bucketload! Now 360 is in the same price bracket the ps2 was a year or two ago its now selling cheap HD entertainment that I feel is better quality than the sony experience, I just wish the case/internals were a bit more up market as the ps3 clearly looks the best under a nice tv setup – but whats the point when all that power is throttled, and Sony so far havent delivered this ’super’ console they promised, they’ve caught up with the 360, thats all – by the time the ps3 overtakes in the graphics department (if possible) the newer xbox 720 will be announced and we’ll be moving all our profiles over to that! (but dont expect anything until end 2011 – plenty of xboxing left).

Wii 2 out next year, possbily with 360 graphics – could be good as mario will look great in HD.

I wish I could say the ps3 is the better model as style wise it looks great, and Im about to buy a console (And so, dont want it to be out of date in 12 months) but it really doesnt justify the cost, I’ve studied many screenshots and videos, you cant tell the difference between the 360 and ps3, partially because the developers dont feel the need to make one better than the other if it still wows and sells without the extra development.

I actually sold my xbox 6 months ago as I’d played every game possible to death, I wanted mobile gaming so thought the psp would be good and I’d get a ps3 to sync it etc. I do wish they made more ‘fluffy’ nintendo style games for 360, as you need a break sometimes (and why I feel the need to always buy a nintendo to!) However, Im going for another xbox as it offers so much for so little, all my work colleagues (and boss!) now have one, overlooking the case quality its a better product with exciting control system to come before its new big brother arrives. I sony want any hope of winning the sales war, they need to get the system in homes – cut the price, make a loss on every box and then make money from the games, get the consoles in the homes – unfortunately microsoft I think have beaten them to the post on that one too.

By: All We Share » Blog Archive » bPS3/b Vs bXbox 360/b: Which Has Better Graphics? | Connected Internet

Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:49:39 +0000

[...] from: bPS3/b Vs bXbox 360/b: Which Has Better Graphics? | Connected Internet Category: High Tech Tags: browser, browser-privacy, could-not, fix-this-problem-yourself, [...]

By: 5t16m4r0

5t16m4r0 — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:24:49 +0000

do not know why up to now people are bickering on which is better. i got a friend who is obviously a ps3 fanboy and my god is HE irritating. he keeps on yapping about how powerful ps3 is. ok, its powerful, oh yeah its bluray. i try to avoid conversation so while he was sitting there beside me ranting about how ps3 owns 360 so much while I AM PLAYING re5 on my 360. i pity the fool who has friends like this. (yah i pity me, but he’s my friend so what can i do.)
reality speaking, ps3 is indeed powerful than 360.
BUT…what to do with that??
would you like to own a more expensive console knowing a cheaper one provides the same performance and actually even better at times.
i don’t want to be labeled as a 360 fanboy, i am not, i appreciate the ps3 technical prowess.
i think IT is the FUTURE OF GAMING.
BUT..right NOW, the PRESENT OF GAMING is 360. Hands down. if you are planning to buy a console now, buy a 360, you will get more than your moneys worth. thinking of buying ps3 for future gaming? then why buy PS3 NOW? buy it in the future. ever heard of a console being more expensive over time? NOPE. it gets cheaper as it gets older (not talking antiques here =p)
after 5 or 6 years 360 may be taken over by ps3, and then, at that moment buy your ps3 and appreciate all that blu-ray and technical power at a much cheaper price with more games to choose from and a more solid online network. think of it this way, ps3 is like an ultra modern car capable of ultra high speed. but it does not run on gasoline, it runs on something we dont have yet in our time. would you buy that now? or buy it in the future where it is cheaper and you can use it all the time because plutonium will be available to the masses LOL.

By: anythingbutsony

anythingbutsony — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:31:19 +0000

and all the talk about can only be done on a ps3 actually the 360 has better graphic power than the ps3. take it or leave it. or you could check this out from someone that produces games for all major platforms. Graphics: The XBOX 360 is a clear winner. The GPU is more powerful. It has more powerful fillrate, and far more pixel and vertex processing horsepower. Part of the reason is their choice of memory, and architecture of pixel and vertex procesing. I can�t get into details but the same vertex shader will run much slower on the PS3 than the XBOX 360. The 360 also has a clever new way rendering high definition anti aliased back buffers. To accomplish the same effect on PS3 is prohibitively expensive. For this reason I think many games will have no choice but to run in non-HD resolutions on the PS3 version, use a lower quality anti aliasing technique, or do back buffer upscaling. The end result in all cases is going to be noticeably worse image quality. so anything that they can do on the ps3 can be done on the 360 but oh so slightly better. ill stick with pc though so yall can have your consoles wich will be obsolete in another 5 to 6 years ill stick with just upping my pc. plus when it comes to it technology is ultimatly found through money and ms has def. got that over sony. rumors are ms is already working on there next console if its true or not is yet to be seen but in the end ms might actually talk sony into bighting when they offer em something they cant refuse and then death to the station once and for all. yay :D

By: Kaden101

Kaden101 — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:49:50 +0000

Fair point bandolero. On the point of graphics then. For multiplatform, recent releases are pretty much identical bar nitpicking, but as the PS3 architecture is not exactly normal it tends to be frame rate that suffers when the ports aren’t that good. For exclusives the PS3 is really showing the way (even if only by a small margin) with the likes of Killzone 2, & Uncharted looks pretty awesome considering it’s an oldie.

As for the 1080 discussion, am I under the impression (correct me if I’m wrong) that the 360 does not support 1080p through HDMI, & that just because a 360 game box says 1080p doesn’t mean that it’s native, it upscales a lot of games. The PS3 on the other hand actually states the native resolution on the back of the box, ie Killzone 2 is 720p because that’s what the box says. The PS3/TV will obviously upscale it to 1080p if that’s what you’ve got. See http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070721/4652/ for more information on this.
Also, I’ve read a few articles that have clearly indicated that the human eye has real trouble telling the difference between 720p & 1080p unless it’s an uber large TV (50″+) & you’re sat close to it (not that you’ll find a 720p TV over that size anyway). I certainly couldn’t tell the difference in the shop when we bought our 40″ Samsung 720p TV, & it was £200-£300 cheaper. See http://reviews.cnet.com/720p-vs-1080p-hdtv/?tag=txt as 1 example of this.

By: bandolero

bandolero — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:00:03 +0000

At Kanden101,

First the topic was”graphics”,reason for reminding you was cause every thread gets damage by reliability on the 360 plus that has nothing to do with graphics anyways, if you don’t have 1080p setup you can’t know which is better. I have both on 1080p and most game look very similar on multi-cross platform games considering is a port 90% of the time to ps3 but when it comes to exclusives ps3 all day. Most 360 fanboys bash ps3 or vice versa for several reasons which is dumb why? Both camps claim victory when the only ones that can claim victory is Developers that are making it possible for games to come looking very similar considering that both have deferent architectures never mind work with a very small amount of resources *Ram* but they manage to give us gamers nice games like Killzone2 and on Gears2.

By: Kaden101

Kaden101 — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 11:43:44 +0000

xbox 360 bundle. While I agree with the overall sentiment of your post, there are a couple of things that need pointing out.
1. 35% of PS3’s power, nah, even Guerilla said that KZ2 used around 60% of PS3’s power, & while there is more to come, I wouldn’t get your hopes up to see something nearly 3 times better than Kilzzone 2.
2. Reliability, I think you & your friends were unlucky with the PS3. It’s a known fact that it’s more reliable than the 360 by a wide margin. 2 years ago the 360’s fail rate was 30%, I think it’s about half that now, while the PS3 is around the 1% mark. Before any 360 fanboys say that Microsoft have completely fixed the 360, shop staff at Game has told me that they are still getting them back daily, including Falcons & Jaspers, & what with the RROD, E74 & disc scratching that was highlighted on Watchdog last week, I don’t think the 360’s problems are over yet.

By: xbox 360 bundle

xbox 360 bundle — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:07:34 +0000

I have both the xbox 360 and the ps3 which are played on a 40″ samsung 1080p lcd, to be honest you can’t really tell the difference unless you really look for it, but when you do the ps3 ever so slightly has the edge, as as mentioned before exclusive titles like Killzone 2 really do show the power of the ps3 compared to the xbox 360. Developers are currently using around 95% of the xbox’s potential whereas they are only using around 35% of the ps3’s potential when developers actually work out how to unleash the power of the ps3 i have no doubt it will blow away the xbox 360. As far as reliability goes i am on my second xbox 360, but i am on my third PS3 so they are pretty much the same, i know loads of people who have had to send their ps3’s back. So which one is best? there is no answer as it depends what you want and how much you have to spend, if you have around £130, dont want to watch blu-rays and don’t mind having to buy a better console a couple of years down the line, then buy the xbox 360 it will do what you want it too for less than half the price of an ps3, but if you want to watch blu-rays on a 1080p tv and want a machine that is future proof for at least 5 years and that will have amazing games as soon as developers learn how to unlock all that ps3 processing power and you have £300 to burn then get the ps3, you won’t regret it!

By: Kaden101

Kaden101 — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:44:29 +0000

Actually, as I mentioned above, I think you’ll find that the PS3 looks like a piano black George Foreman Grill, & the 360 look s like a Wheelie bin leashed to a breeze block, which not suprisingly is where a lot of 360’s probably end up.

By: jamie

jamie — Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:45:06 +0000

xbox 360s are muuuuuch better than ps3s because ps 3s look like aliens dicks and when im playin a game a nice little red light appears around the power button witch flashes too! also this is to all of u who prefer ps3s: fuuuuuuuuuucccccckkkk ooooooooofffffffffffffffffffffffffff uuuuuuuuuuuu nnnnnob heads. fhg q p

By: Kaden101

Kaden101 — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:11:50 +0000

1. The difference between 720p & 1080p is not visible to the human eye unless you’re on a 60″+ screen & sitting 6 inches from it.
2. As far as PS3 vs 360 on the 1080p thing, see http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070721/4652/. It makes some interesting points about the fact that 360 games are not necessarliy natively 1080p, but the box will state 1080p because that is what they are upscaled to. If a PS3 game is 720p, that’s what it will say on the back of the box, same with 1080p. Again, if you can tell the difference.
3. Comparing multiplatform games developed on the 360, & then ported to the PS3 without due care & attention may be the easiest way to say the 360 is better, but it only paints half the picture. I know it’s more difficult to compare platform exclusives, but that is where a console truly shines. Killzone 2 is 720p, but it currently wipes the floor (graphically) with anything else done on a console. It’s got a steady framerate, & all without an install.
Graphically it’s already surpassed the 360. It’s been out a year less, & it’s not as easy to program for. I’m so looking forward to God of War III, Uncharted 2, Gran Turismo 5, Infamous, & Heavy Rain. Multiplatform games are just there to pass the time until the really good stuff lands.
You say the 360 is a better gaming console, I say that depends on what you want out of your gaming console. 360 suits some people, PS3 for others.

By: muchilus

muchilus — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:23:20 +0000

that’s not true, the ps3 doesn’t have better graphics, are equal or less, tecnical speaking the ps3 is superior , but in real world scenario the xbox 360 is far behond better. not only the graphics, also how smooth is rendering.

for example,

most of ps3 that are available also for xbox360, works only 720p resolution instead of 1080P of 99% of xbox 360 games. then let’s talk of FPS (frames x seconds) the xbox 360 are more smooth. if you compare, COD4, COD5, STARWARS UNLEASHED, GTA4, FINAL NIGHT 3. the difference are awesome, i had both system connected to SAMSUNG A850 52″ 120HZ running 1080p and believe every detail you can see it.

the only advantage of the ps3 is
-has less RMA
-bluray player
-bluetooth tecnology
-most of the game use DTS SOUND, instead of DOLBY DIGITAL, witch has better sample rate 1.5mb against 640kbps of dolby.

in the end, XBOX 360 IS BETTER GAMING CONSOLE and not to talke about online experience!.

By: Apparent cock

Apparent cock — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:14:40 +0000

You just cant afford it gypsy!

By: Kaden101

Kaden101 — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:39:21 +0000

I thought my previous post wasn't particularly helpful, but then I read hxgsygsu's. The obvious effort that went into his post astounds me. I stand corrected on my opinions, & bow down to his obvious wisdom & maturity. I think I need to go home & box up my PS3 to trade in for a 360. Then again, do I really want to lose the ability to form coherent sentences? Not that I'd suggest for a second that 360 owners can't put a sentence together, that'd be a generalisation after all. Just making sure that all the 360 hating dicksss know where they stand!I'm still keeping my PS3, it goes with the piano black telly, & my better halfs Wii goes with white floating shelves. A 360 would just make the place look untidy.

By: hxgsygsu

hxgsygsu — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:07:04 +0000

XBOX rrrrrrrrrrrrroooooooooooooooooooxxxxxs and all of u that dont like it u r dicksss

By: Kaden101

Kaden101 — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:01:52 +0000

The question is do you want a shiny black box that resembles a George Foreman grill, or do you want something that resembles a wheelie bin with a breeze block attached to it, that sounds like a ferrell cat chewing a brick when you put a disc in the drive. At least if you turn off the room lights, the red glow is pretty.

By: playboy

playboy — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:00:27 +0000

both consoles suck,its all about a good PC now.consoles are only good for a few weeks when they first hit the shops but after that PC wipes the floor with both of them shittie console junk

By: cherubin

cherubin — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:52:33 +0000

ps3 rocks because i have a ps3 and a 360 but the ps3 is much better because it has better technology and better graphics so the ps3 are the best and the 360 sucks

By: Kaden101

Kaden101 — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:58:49 +0000

Gangster, your constructive & well thought out argument in favour of the PS3 could do with a tad more refinement. You’re making PS3 owners look like 12 year old fruitloop fanboys, thanks for that.

By: gangster

gangster — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:18:09 +0000

ps3 is gangsta and xbox 360 is shit and its gay fu xbox 360

if ur cool buy the ps3 not the xbox 360

By: jj evans

jj evans — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:35:05 +0000

xbox sucks dick man i own both and i get sick of seeing that red light on the XBOX 3SHITTY! PS3 WOT

By: bad man

bad man — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 12:52:28 +0000

Everyone is this thing has said PS3 has better graphics and i agree but i heard this guy who is a programer for both of them and he says that the Xbox has better graphics. :S :S :S

By: liam hall

liam hall — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:26:15 +0000

i have played the 360 and ps3 and ps3 all the way!!

By: Ps3 and 360

Ps3 and 360 — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:43:45 +0000

I reckon the xbox 360 console itself looks cooler and the Ps3 is just a black box. but ps3 has better graphics…. Halo 3 and fable 2 gears of War2 are all on xbox 360 so i play my xbox more meself.

By: damainevent

damainevent — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 05:10:35 +0000

im happy with my 360. Ive played both. ps3 has better graphics just by a tad but 360 selection Price (i happy with regular dvd’s) and has better first person shooters!

By: aaron

aaron — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:07:24 +0000

ps3 is much better with its ps3 home coming up and trophie system on iuts way it is better looks better and better graphics fuck xbox 360 lol

By: Maxwell

Maxwell — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:39:23 +0000

Ps3 is the best for people that want to play online with their friends. 360 is great for now but sooner or later 15 dollars a month to play with your friends is anoughter cell phone bill I hate bills. plus the controller sucks. The best one was made for the wii and I only like a few games for it.

By: Jololopez

Jololopez — Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:18:54 +0000

Man…I dont know but I feel like the lot of yall are blind. I own Ps3 and 360…a great hdtv..and a killer sound system…and heres something most people with half a brain already know…Ps3 looks better…way clearer…more contrast in ports…much sharper if you aint blind…and sounds much better…prime example of 360 tapping out is gears of war2…does not compare to ps3 at all…I was a 360 fan until I got my ps3…then I seen the light…not the red one…LOL

By: PS3 OWNED

PS3 OWNED — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:58:19 +0000

This just in, Sony says “In light of the financial crisis and low sales that we may pull the PS3 off the shelves anytime from 24 to 36 months” Did you hear that? Xbox 360 won! :D
Sorry PS3 fans, but Xbox wins this battle.

By: Danny Hunt

Danny Hunt — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:50:32 +0000

After owning an xbox 360 for 2 years I recieved the dreaded Red Ring Of Death. I was that infuriated that Microsoft had commissioned the release of several hundred thousand sub standard XBOX units, all with the same inherant problem (Weak, lead free solder joints on the motherboard that came loose when the unit get too warm) that I bought a PS3. A little less intuitive I feel than the 360, but hey I’m a new user. All I can say is if Microsoft are more than happy to f**k over their customers with inferior product manufacture, then I’m just as happy to switch to Sony (At a great financial cost I might add) and persevere until their console finally wipes the floor with Microsoft. Just wish I’d just done it 2 years ago and saved myself a 4 week return policy on my unit and a 50 minute conversation with a call centre in India. For shame Microsoft, you’ve lost a loyal fan….

By: JIm360

JIm360 — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:01:26 +0000

We hear so much about the so called ”potential” of the PS3.It’s been 2 years now but we’ haven’t seen anything that shows ps3 has more potential. The results, which are tha games, show that technically the 360 does better. Some research would also prove that :
http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?threadid=1066963

By: oni

oni — Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:57:25 +0000

some one said that the ps3 had nothing like the red ring of death on an xbox360, think again, sony has done a good job of hiding it, but there is the yellow light of death on the sony playstation 3, so buy beware, honestly, sony fan boys are so annoying, both are great, no need to act liek your shit dont stink:)

By: LOL

LOL — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:28:45 +0000

The PS3 and XBOX are very similar in graphics at the time. Although viewing movies are so much better on the ps3 including bluray and all other media files. I also do think the ps3 may win this battle if you give it more time. At the time it seems that ps3 has a lot more potential and the XBOX is pushing as hard as it can go.

By: Education Blog

Education Blog — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 04:12:10 +0000

Thanks to the article, Now there is more reason to comment than ever before! Everyone should participate. I am incorporating what your wrote to our project!

By: Michael Lankton

Michael Lankton — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:15:00 +0000

The systems are pretty even, but the 360 fanboys are a lot less annoying than the Sony fanboys. Advantage: Xbox 360

Read Michael Lankton’s latest blog post….Interview: Bruce Thigpen of Eminent Technology>>>

By: dan

dan — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:41:12 +0000

ps3 rules 360 ps3 has blu ray the future 360 has crappy pal even on hd its crap

By: Cheap Xbox 360 Games

Cheap Xbox 360 Games — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:35:26 +0000

As above – think graphics are on par so all in all in comes down to one persons opinion as there doesnt appear to be any distinct difference.

By: josh

josh — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:15:14 +0000

ps3 is on par with the xbox in the graphics section but xbox live and gamer score is better than the ps3 trophies but its still a excellent choice if you want a blu ray player and a home entertainment system.Im thinking about getting a xbox o ive got both ps3 and xbox because of the must have games like halo and gears of war but the ps3 has metal gear solid and grand turismo so i cant searate them if you can tell me

By: Ryan

Ryan — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:00:27 +0000

i dont no wt 2 get a ps3 or an xbox 360 i av alredy got a wii but i need sum help on what to pick?

By: leo

leo — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:45:13 +0000

aircommando13 PLEASE WAKE UP BOY,YOU ARE IN NO MANS LAND

OMG LOL LOL LOL LOL

By: leo

leo — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:38:44 +0000

at last,some people with some brains kool,

NOW EAT YOUR WORDS PS3 FANBOYS

LOL IF YOU STILL THINK THE PS3 IS A BETTER CONSOLE,WELL YOU HAVE NO HOPE, I AM TELLING YA

By: Michael Lankton

Michael Lankton — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:17:59 +0000

“The 360 and the PS3 are equal in power in my eyes. Maybe the PS3 has more processing power. The 360 has more available memory. It’s pretty much a net, net. The public perception of the PS3 was that it was much more powerful. To developers, they look even.” -Dennis Dyack, Silicon Knights

Microsoft has delivered two consoles that have great developer tools and straightforward architecture. I hate to give them props for anything, but they’ve done the game console thing right. Throw Xbox Live into the equation, and really, unless you’re Japanese, who cares about Sony at this point?

Blu Ray? Don’t get too excited. 4k2k will be in homes within the next five years, and it doubles the resolution of Blu Ray. On top of that, using a game console as your DVD player is lame; buy some dedicated equipment you ps3 pinheads.

The only people I see being excited about the PS3 are those that are trying to justify their investment. What is the draw to buy a ps3 at the price they are asking? MGS4? Sorry, not worth it for one game.

In every area, the 360 destroys the ps3, and will leave enough money in your wallet for you to go buy a Wii too.

Read Michael Lankton’s latest blog post….Klipsch Icon W Series Loudspeakers>>>