<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backlash Against Large Sites Using NoFollow Begining?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/</link>
	<description>Updated daily with the latest news, tips, tweaks, social networking, wordpress tips &#38; tweaks, windows optimization help and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:47:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-3/#comment-97290</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-97290</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amazing how many webmasters don&#039;t even know about &quot;nofollow.&quot; They believe that every link to their site give them a higher page rank, so they go on every possible forum, social networking site, blog, etc., assuming that they will boost their page rank from all those posts they do. Still, it&#039;s not a bad idea to use this strategy, at the very least for some old-fashioned public relations. Even if the links don&#039;t boost page rank, their name is getting out there with each link added.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how many webmasters don&#8217;t even know about &#8220;nofollow.&#8221; They believe that every link to their site give them a higher page rank, so they go on every possible forum, social networking site, blog, etc., assuming that they will boost their page rank from all those posts they do. Still, it&#8217;s not a bad idea to use this strategy, at the very least for some old-fashioned public relations. Even if the links don&#8217;t boost page rank, their name is getting out there with each link added.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-3/#comment-224260</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-224260</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amazing how many webmasters don&#039;t even know about &quot;nofollow.&quot; They believe that every link to their site give them a higher page rank, so they go on every possible forum, social networking site, blog, etc., assuming that they will boost their page rank from all those posts they do. Still, it&#039;s not a bad idea to use this strategy, at the very least for some old-fashioned public relations. Even if the links don&#039;t boost page rank, their name is getting out there with each link added.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing how many webmasters don&#8217;t even know about &#8220;nofollow.&#8221; They believe that every link to their site give them a higher page rank, so they go on every possible forum, social networking site, blog, etc., assuming that they will boost their page rank from all those posts they do. Still, it&#8217;s not a bad idea to use this strategy, at the very least for some old-fashioned public relations. Even if the links don&#8217;t boost page rank, their name is getting out there with each link added.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Cruickshank</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-3/#comment-74142</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Cruickshank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-74142</guid>
		<description>Google almost definitely does not ignore nofollow. I really think captchas would solve the spam problem much more effectively, especially if combined with moderation (and maybe a ranking system like the ones on slashdot or digg). Nofollow does little besides discouraging discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google almost definitely does not ignore nofollow. I really think captchas would solve the spam problem much more effectively, especially if combined with moderation (and maybe a ranking system like the ones on slashdot or digg). Nofollow does little besides discouraging discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Cruickshank</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-3/#comment-224259</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Cruickshank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-224259</guid>
		<description>Google almost definitely does not ignore nofollow. I really think captchas would solve the spam problem much more effectively, especially if combined with moderation (and maybe a ranking system like the ones on slashdot or digg). Nofollow does little besides discouraging discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google almost definitely does not ignore nofollow. I really think captchas would solve the spam problem much more effectively, especially if combined with moderation (and maybe a ranking system like the ones on slashdot or digg). Nofollow does little besides discouraging discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shortship</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-3/#comment-72721</link>
		<dc:creator>shortship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 07:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-72721</guid>
		<description>Well, I can see where nofollows come from.  According to google, whatever links are on your site, this counts as an &#039;endorsement&#039; from you.  If you do not put the links there, you cannot vouch for them.  Outbound links to spam pages can hurt your own page ranking, etc.

Now, that being said, in a perfect world, users would not be running spam pages, and all readers of your blog would just be linking back to their own blog, where they may have even given you some link love by continuing the topic of the conversation on their own page.

Wikipedia though... nofollows leave a bad taste in my mouth.  It would be like if you the blogger wrote about some topic from another article, and nofollowed *that* link.  Wikipedia is copying (in many cases, merely just rewording, like a 4th grade book report) valuable information found online, and then BAM, now wikipedia ranks higher than you do in all searches, even though they just took your in depth research and claimed it as their own.  And what do you have to show for it?  It used to give you a boost in rank, but now.. it really just hurts you.  It&#039;s pretty disgusting.  Especially when so many spammers of wikipedia are caught and policed for adding their own links, I do not see how nofollows add anything to the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can see where nofollows come from.  According to google, whatever links are on your site, this counts as an &#8216;endorsement&#8217; from you.  If you do not put the links there, you cannot vouch for them.  Outbound links to spam pages can hurt your own page ranking, etc.</p>
<p>Now, that being said, in a perfect world, users would not be running spam pages, and all readers of your blog would just be linking back to their own blog, where they may have even given you some link love by continuing the topic of the conversation on their own page.</p>
<p>Wikipedia though&#8230; nofollows leave a bad taste in my mouth.  It would be like if you the blogger wrote about some topic from another article, and nofollowed *that* link.  Wikipedia is copying (in many cases, merely just rewording, like a 4th grade book report) valuable information found online, and then BAM, now wikipedia ranks higher than you do in all searches, even though they just took your in depth research and claimed it as their own.  And what do you have to show for it?  It used to give you a boost in rank, but now.. it really just hurts you.  It&#8217;s pretty disgusting.  Especially when so many spammers of wikipedia are caught and policed for adding their own links, I do not see how nofollows add anything to the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shortship</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-3/#comment-224258</link>
		<dc:creator>shortship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 07:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-224258</guid>
		<description>Well, I can see where nofollows come from.  According to google, whatever links are on your site, this counts as an &#039;endorsement&#039; from you.  If you do not put the links there, you cannot vouch for them.  Outbound links to spam pages can hurt your own page ranking, etc.

Now, that being said, in a perfect world, users would not be running spam pages, and all readers of your blog would just be linking back to their own blog, where they may have even given you some link love by continuing the topic of the conversation on their own page.

Wikipedia though... nofollows leave a bad taste in my mouth.  It would be like if you the blogger wrote about some topic from another article, and nofollowed *that* link.  Wikipedia is copying (in many cases, merely just rewording, like a 4th grade book report) valuable information found online, and then BAM, now wikipedia ranks higher than you do in all searches, even though they just took your in depth research and claimed it as their own.  And what do you have to show for it?  It used to give you a boost in rank, but now.. it really just hurts you.  It&#039;s pretty disgusting.  Especially when so many spammers of wikipedia are caught and policed for adding their own links, I do not see how nofollows add anything to the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can see where nofollows come from.  According to google, whatever links are on your site, this counts as an &#8216;endorsement&#8217; from you.  If you do not put the links there, you cannot vouch for them.  Outbound links to spam pages can hurt your own page ranking, etc.</p>
<p>Now, that being said, in a perfect world, users would not be running spam pages, and all readers of your blog would just be linking back to their own blog, where they may have even given you some link love by continuing the topic of the conversation on their own page.</p>
<p>Wikipedia though&#8230; nofollows leave a bad taste in my mouth.  It would be like if you the blogger wrote about some topic from another article, and nofollowed *that* link.  Wikipedia is copying (in many cases, merely just rewording, like a 4th grade book report) valuable information found online, and then BAM, now wikipedia ranks higher than you do in all searches, even though they just took your in depth research and claimed it as their own.  And what do you have to show for it?  It used to give you a boost in rank, but now.. it really just hurts you.  It&#8217;s pretty disgusting.  Especially when so many spammers of wikipedia are caught and policed for adding their own links, I do not see how nofollows add anything to the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3gp</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-2/#comment-69224</link>
		<dc:creator>3gp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 06:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-69224</guid>
		<description>I think everton when google annouced paid links exclusion and giving high rank to editorial links the sites or bloggers are going to change their policy rather then selling links they will charge for editorial links. 

But for me nofollow tag create flag in the eyes of google as if you are not trusting your own sites why would google trust urs. just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think everton when google annouced paid links exclusion and giving high rank to editorial links the sites or bloggers are going to change their policy rather then selling links they will charge for editorial links. </p>
<p>But for me nofollow tag create flag in the eyes of google as if you are not trusting your own sites why would google trust urs. just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3gp</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-2/#comment-224257</link>
		<dc:creator>3gp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 06:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-224257</guid>
		<description>I think everton when google annouced paid links exclusion and giving high rank to editorial links the sites or bloggers are going to change their policy rather then selling links they will charge for editorial links. 

But for me nofollow tag create flag in the eyes of google as if you are not trusting your own sites why would google trust urs. just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think everton when google annouced paid links exclusion and giving high rank to editorial links the sites or bloggers are going to change their policy rather then selling links they will charge for editorial links. </p>
<p>But for me nofollow tag create flag in the eyes of google as if you are not trusting your own sites why would google trust urs. just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-2/#comment-69191</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-69191</guid>
		<description>I need to spend some time updating my list with this one

I have been nofollowing some of them for a while, others I just avoid linking to.

I just encourage people to join my dofollow community on Bumpzee which is growing well, and provides a central core of information and some great blogs to interact with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to spend some time updating my list with this one</p>
<p>I have been nofollowing some of them for a while, others I just avoid linking to.</p>
<p>I just encourage people to join my dofollow community on Bumpzee which is growing well, and provides a central core of information and some great blogs to interact with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyBeard</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-2/#comment-224256</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyBeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-224256</guid>
		<description>I need to spend some time updating my list with this one

I have been nofollowing some of them for a while, others I just avoid linking to.

I just encourage people to join my dofollow community on Bumpzee which is growing well, and provides a central core of information and some great blogs to interact with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to spend some time updating my list with this one</p>
<p>I have been nofollowing some of them for a while, others I just avoid linking to.</p>
<p>I just encourage people to join my dofollow community on Bumpzee which is growing well, and provides a central core of information and some great blogs to interact with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazar</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-2/#comment-69148</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 01:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-69148</guid>
		<description>...&#039;I think search engines are more and more IGNORING the nofollow tags&#039;...

Google DOES NOT IGNORE nofollow. I am 100% sure about this as I was doing experiments on my main web-site which has several solid PR4 pages and only 2 dozen inlinks from other solid sites (in other words - situation can be approximated with a controlled experiment). When I put nofollow&#039;s on most internal (and external) links, many pages went into supplemental index. In addition, one that was 1st (first = top = the very top) out of million+ results for a 3 word phrase for MONTHS, now is not showing anywhere in the main index results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8217;I think search engines are more and more IGNORING the nofollow tags&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>Google DOES NOT IGNORE nofollow. I am 100% sure about this as I was doing experiments on my main web-site which has several solid PR4 pages and only 2 dozen inlinks from other solid sites (in other words &#8211; situation can be approximated with a controlled experiment). When I put nofollow&#8217;s on most internal (and external) links, many pages went into supplemental index. In addition, one that was 1st (first = top = the very top) out of million+ results for a 3 word phrase for MONTHS, now is not showing anywhere in the main index results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazar</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-2/#comment-224255</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-224255</guid>
		<description>...&#039;I think search engines are more and more IGNORING the nofollow tags&#039;...

Google DOES NOT IGNORE nofollow. I am 100% sure about this as I was doing experiments on my main web-site which has several solid PR4 pages and only 2 dozen inlinks from other solid sites (in other words - situation can be approximated with a controlled experiment). When I put nofollow&#039;s on most internal (and external) links, many pages went into supplemental index. In addition, one that was 1st (first = top = the very top) out of million+ results for a 3 word phrase for MONTHS, now is not showing anywhere in the main index results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8217;I think search engines are more and more IGNORING the nofollow tags&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>Google DOES NOT IGNORE nofollow. I am 100% sure about this as I was doing experiments on my main web-site which has several solid PR4 pages and only 2 dozen inlinks from other solid sites (in other words &#8211; situation can be approximated with a controlled experiment). When I put nofollow&#8217;s on most internal (and external) links, many pages went into supplemental index. In addition, one that was 1st (first = top = the very top) out of million+ results for a 3 word phrase for MONTHS, now is not showing anywhere in the main index results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nirmal</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-2/#comment-69119</link>
		<dc:creator>Nirmal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-69119</guid>
		<description>There has been lot of discussion on this nofollow. Obviously large sites can&#039;t give link love. But most of the blogs have started the U follow, I follow campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been lot of discussion on this nofollow. Obviously large sites can&#8217;t give link love. But most of the blogs have started the U follow, I follow campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nirmal</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-2/#comment-224254</link>
		<dc:creator>Nirmal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-224254</guid>
		<description>There has been lot of discussion on this nofollow. Obviously large sites can&#039;t give link love. But most of the blogs have started the U follow, I follow campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been lot of discussion on this nofollow. Obviously large sites can&#8217;t give link love. But most of the blogs have started the U follow, I follow campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-2/#comment-69106</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-69106</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;nice idea, i don&#039;t think it&#039;d ever work though&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice idea, i don&#8217;t think it&#8217;d ever work though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-2/#comment-224253</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-224253</guid>
		<description>nice idea, i don&#039;t think it&#039;d ever work though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice idea, i don&#8217;t think it&#8217;d ever work though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-1/#comment-69098</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 06:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-69098</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see more information on the idea that search engines are ignoring nofollow. That&#039;s a compelling thought.

As for this little plugin: I think all things begin small. We have no idea how much of an impact it will make until some time passes and things happen, or don&#039;t happen. In the meantime, I think it&#039;s worth my time to blog about it tomorrow. 

I Floow, but I don&#039;t care for those massive dofollow lists. I see it kind of like karma. What I give will come back to me in good ways in the end,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see more information on the idea that search engines are ignoring nofollow. That&#8217;s a compelling thought.</p>
<p>As for this little plugin: I think all things begin small. We have no idea how much of an impact it will make until some time passes and things happen, or don&#8217;t happen. In the meantime, I think it&#8217;s worth my time to blog about it tomorrow. </p>
<p>I Floow, but I don&#8217;t care for those massive dofollow lists. I see it kind of like karma. What I give will come back to me in good ways in the end,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-1/#comment-224252</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 06:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-224252</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see more information on the idea that search engines are ignoring nofollow. That&#039;s a compelling thought.

As for this little plugin: I think all things begin small. We have no idea how much of an impact it will make until some time passes and things happen, or don&#039;t happen. In the meantime, I think it&#039;s worth my time to blog about it tomorrow. 

I Floow, but I don&#039;t care for those massive dofollow lists. I see it kind of like karma. What I give will come back to me in good ways in the end,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see more information on the idea that search engines are ignoring nofollow. That&#8217;s a compelling thought.</p>
<p>As for this little plugin: I think all things begin small. We have no idea how much of an impact it will make until some time passes and things happen, or don&#8217;t happen. In the meantime, I think it&#8217;s worth my time to blog about it tomorrow. </p>
<p>I Floow, but I don&#8217;t care for those massive dofollow lists. I see it kind of like karma. What I give will come back to me in good ways in the end,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-1/#comment-69095</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 06:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-69095</guid>
		<description>The idea of nofollow is fundamentally flawed so lets just hope the search engines fix their software and remove the need for it then it can be ignored by them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of nofollow is fundamentally flawed so lets just hope the search engines fix their software and remove the need for it then it can be ignored by them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-1/#comment-224251</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 06:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-224251</guid>
		<description>The idea of nofollow is fundamentally flawed so lets just hope the search engines fix their software and remove the need for it then it can be ignored by them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of nofollow is fundamentally flawed so lets just hope the search engines fix their software and remove the need for it then it can be ignored by them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Book</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-1/#comment-69084</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Book</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 03:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-69084</guid>
		<description>haha.. it&#039;s really funny idea i think.
banning bigger site? well.. i don&#039;t think they&#039;ll even care about it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha.. it&#8217;s really funny idea i think.<br />
banning bigger site? well.. i don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll even care about it <img src="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?6dc32e" alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Book</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-1/#comment-224250</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Book</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-224250</guid>
		<description>haha.. it&#039;s really funny idea i think.
banning bigger site? well.. i don&#039;t think they&#039;ll even care about it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha.. it&#8217;s really funny idea i think.<br />
banning bigger site? well.. i don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll even care about it <img src="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?6dc32e" alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan and Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-1/#comment-69081</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan and Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 03:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-69081</guid>
		<description>Hey Everton,

This whole &quot;nofollow&quot; business is rooted in a very lack mentality.

As a blogger, I really don&#039;t think it&#039;s worth your cycles to worry about it. Since people can arbitrarily put nofollow tags on whatever they choose, I think search engines are more and more IGNORING the nofollow tags. :-)

Everton, I think the steps you&#039;re taking to encourage comments and point out that you don&#039;t have the nofollow lack mentality is excellent, but I wouldn&#039;t spend my cycles going beyond that. 

Have an awesome day!
Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Everton,</p>
<p>This whole &#8220;nofollow&#8221; business is rooted in a very lack mentality.</p>
<p>As a blogger, I really don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth your cycles to worry about it. Since people can arbitrarily put nofollow tags on whatever they choose, I think search engines are more and more IGNORING the nofollow tags. <img src="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?6dc32e" alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Everton, I think the steps you&#8217;re taking to encourage comments and point out that you don&#8217;t have the nofollow lack mentality is excellent, but I wouldn&#8217;t spend my cycles going beyond that. </p>
<p>Have an awesome day!<br />
Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan and Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-1/#comment-224249</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan and Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 03:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-224249</guid>
		<description>Hey Everton,

This whole &quot;nofollow&quot; business is rooted in a very lack mentality.

As a blogger, I really don&#039;t think it&#039;s worth your cycles to worry about it. Since people can arbitrarily put nofollow tags on whatever they choose, I think search engines are more and more IGNORING the nofollow tags. :-)

Everton, I think the steps you&#039;re taking to encourage comments and point out that you don&#039;t have the nofollow lack mentality is excellent, but I wouldn&#039;t spend my cycles going beyond that. 

Have an awesome day!
Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Everton,</p>
<p>This whole &#8220;nofollow&#8221; business is rooted in a very lack mentality.</p>
<p>As a blogger, I really don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth your cycles to worry about it. Since people can arbitrarily put nofollow tags on whatever they choose, I think search engines are more and more IGNORING the nofollow tags. <img src="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?6dc32e" alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Everton, I think the steps you&#8217;re taking to encourage comments and point out that you don&#8217;t have the nofollow lack mentality is excellent, but I wouldn&#8217;t spend my cycles going beyond that. </p>
<p>Have an awesome day!<br />
Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: listikal</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-1/#comment-69069</link>
		<dc:creator>listikal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-69069</guid>
		<description>I think we all understand why these sites are mandatory.  Especially for Wikipedia, every single page has such a high PR, that you can easily manipulate the &quot;system&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we all understand why these sites are mandatory.  Especially for Wikipedia, every single page has such a high PR, that you can easily manipulate the &#8220;system&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: listikal</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/comment-page-1/#comment-224248</link>
		<dc:creator>listikal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/06/26/backlash-against-large-sites-using-nofollow-begining/#comment-224248</guid>
		<description>I think we all understand why these sites are mandatory.  Especially for Wikipedia, every single page has such a high PR, that you can easily manipulate the &quot;system&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we all understand why these sites are mandatory.  Especially for Wikipedia, every single page has such a high PR, that you can easily manipulate the &#8220;system&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 2/32 queries in 0.015 seconds using apc
Object Caching 757/766 objects using apc

Served from: www.connectedinternet.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 23:07:15 -->
