Subscribe via RSS FeedRandom Post

The Format War: Blu Ray Vs. HD DVD, Part 3

View Comments October 1, 2007 | Michael Lankton

In Round 1 Of Blu Ray Vs HD DVD we ran down what Blu Ray and HD DVD do and elaborated on the features. Round 2 focused on the history of the two formats, and exclusive relationships the two sides have forged with content providers and retailers.

Now it’s time for the third and final round of this championship bout, and I’m going to tell you what I really think about the whole thing.

Gentlemen, let’s get it on!

First, I just want to say that movies taken from good transfers that receive quality encoding treatment on both Blu Ray and HD DVD look fantastic. As a film lover, I couldn’t be happier. I definitely find myself buying titles that would otherwise be rentals for me, because I am so impressed with the video and audio fidelity the two formats are capable of providing. Beyond whatever reason you favor one format or the other, I hope we all agree that it’s the movies that really count here.

That said, I have to admit that the Blu Ray/HD DVD Format War is something of a guilty pleasure for me. People get passionate about trivial things, and I’m pretty sure that there are people in both camps of this Format War that would pick up arms if it came to that. I try to remain objective and present things neutrally on my site, as my focus is news and not opinion. I have caught myself on more than one occasion putting something in an article that shows my personal bias, and it makes me laugh. It’s human nature to pick sides in a fight, after all. If you want a flashback to the good old days of usenet trolling, baiting and flamefests, go hit the Blu Ray and HD DVD section of any big AV web forum.

Equally amusing are some of the verbal stones the two sides have thrown at each other. There are quite a few people involved in this that have absolutely no idea whatsoever what their market is, and absolutely no clue what is important to the consumer. Honestly, at any given time it seems like one or both sides have no interest in winning.

The studios are still divided, and that will impact people’s choice. Blu Ray has Disney, Fox, Sony Pictures, Screen Gems, Columbia, Tri Star, MGM, and Lionsgate. HD DVD has Universal, Paramount, Dreamworks and Weinstein. Warner Bros. and New Line release on both formats. If you are a big fan of any of these studios, their allegiance will impact your decision.

Both formats have pluses and minuses, and both will wow you with the best high definition video you’ve ever seen. I write about AV gear and news, and you’d think that I would choose to have both Blu Ray and HD DVD in my home. However, like most of you, I work for a living. I have a wife, two kids, a mortgage and two car payments. At this point in my life I have to chose one or the other, just like most enthusiasts and consumers will have to. I spent lots of time doing lots of homework reading lots of editorial reviews, lots of consumer reviews, lots of web forum threads and auditioning lots of equipment (and after that sentence this web page is going to score lots higher on Google serps for the search term “lots”). Since it’s human nature to pick a side in a fight, that’s exactly what I did:

I chose HD DVD.

From the very beginning the specifications for HD DVD were in place, and from the very beginning the video and audio offered by the format were outstanding. First generation HD DVD hardware was painfully slow, and was prone to freezing, like a PC running Windows 95. However, the software was ready.

Now that we are entering the third generation of HD DVD hardware, the hardware is approaching the speed and flawless playback of standard DVD players. The only real headache for HD DVD has been problems with combo disc (standard DVD on one side, HD DVD on the other) playback, but it appears that the studios are doing away with combo discs altogether.

Contrast that to Sony’s Blu Ray, which was rushed to Market with incomplete specifications so that Toshiba wouldn’t build an insurmountable lead in the marketplace. In the beginning, Blu Ray dual layer discs were not capable of being produced in batches with acceptable yields, so all the early Blu Ray discs were single layer, and possessed less storage capacity than HD DVD did. On top of that, Blu Ray was utilizing mpeg2, the same video compression as it’s predecessor DVD, and the digital artifacts present in DVD video were glaringly apparent in high definition. In terms of video quality, Blu Ray was a firm second place in the early days of this rivalry.

In fact, since the Blu Ray Profile specification is still in flux, current and future Blu Ray player owners have no guarantee that their players will function properly with future software. If I paid $1500 for a Pioneer Elite Blu Ray player only to find that a year later it was severely handicapped in functionality, I would be seriously bent. That is the situation every current Blu Ray stand alone player owner finds themselves in.

I really take issue with a company that displays this kind of arrogance. Sony thought they would force adoption of Blu Ray with the Playstation 3. It didn’t happen, because the Playstation 3 was the wrong videogame console at the wrong price, and people didn’t come. Toshiba is guilty of not fighting the best fight in this war, but they never made me feel like they had a casual and utter disregard for me as a consumer.

There it is. I love HD DVD. I hope it can survive in the market, if not win, because it offers a great user experience. HD DVD’s future is looking brighter with the acquisition of Paramount/Dreamworks exclusivity, and sales numbers have been creeping upwards weekly. Don’t kid yourself though, if they announced the demise of HD DVD tomorrow, the day after tomorrow I would be purchasing a combo or Blu Ray player, because I want the movies.

One of the drawbacks of a format war where both parties are holding their own is that the public is in no hurry to adopt. Let’s face it, combined Blu Ray and HD DVD disc sales are about 1% of standard DVD sales. In all probability, neither of these formats will replace DVD. Blu Ray and HD DVD are more of a bridge between DVD and whatever that replacement format ends up being.

I would love to tell all of you to run out and embrace Blu Ray or HD DVD, but knowing that one format may not survive, I can’t do that. If you’re an AV Enthusiast or a film buff, you owe it to yourself to experience what real high definition has to offer. If one of these two sides actually ends up winning the war and we are left with a single format, by all means, everybody dive in. The water’s fine.

Tip: Click here to run a free scan for common PC errors

GD Star Rating
loading...

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Category: AV&Home Theatre

Next Post: »»

Prev Post: »»

About Michael Lankton: Have you been a bass player in a hardcore punk band? Built stroker Harleys? Have you been in a fight this month? Written an article about SEO that somehow managed to turn into a social commentary editorial?Mike has.Since 2007 Mike has been sharing his unique worldview with Connected Internet readers. Stop back to see what Mike is thinking about next week. View posts.

  • Thank goodness a single format has at last been decided upon....less confusion for consumers. Thanks for the great article!

    Read Gary's latest blog post....Best Selling Animated Movies on BluRay>>>
  • @mlankton
    My issue is not with it being cracked, but its affect on me, the consumer. If someone cracks the computer player code and they retire keys all the time, and i am forced to pay for updates and or new versions of software, then I am going to get pretty freaking tired with HD-DVD. or if my hardware hddvd player needs constant internet access thats going to make me angry as well..

    blu ray probably has similiar issues as you pointed out.. but.. its all just obnoixious.
  • from the wikipedia
    "Hackers also claim to have found Device Keys [17] (used to calculate the Processing Key) and a Host Private Key [18] (a key signed by the AACS LA used for hand-shaking between host and HD drive; required for reading the Volume ID)." so theres *3* keys.. one key to rule them all, one key to bi... er I mean

    So the device key is specific to each drive
    The processing key is what is able to decrypt the HDDVD and is the same universally
    The Host Private key is required to read the volume ID.. and.. oh.. volume ID i guess that makes 4

    And *heres* what I was talking about.. again from the wikia

    "On April 16, 2007, the AACS consortium announced that it had expired certain encryption keys used by PC-based applications. Patches were available for WinDVD and PowerDVD which used new and uncompromised encryption keys.[24] [25] The old, compromised keys can still be used to decrypt old titles, but not newer releases as they will be encrypted with these new keys. Legitimate users of the affected players are forced to upgrade or replace their player software in order to view new titles."


    So, it may only affect PCs, but they expired certain keys, and all new titles are encrypted with a new key that no longer is usable by first gen software.

    It doesnt seem to affect hardware, but if someone manages to crack the hardware, they will do the same thing, rendering older hardware obsolete? Of course, who is gonig to bother cracking the hardware when there is perfectly good computer access to hack.. lol
  • @mlankton

    I'm not actually at all sure how the encryption scheme worked for hd dvd. I thought that the AACS generator no longer worked because they updated the encryption key (their private key used to generate users keys I guess), so that would mean the key to generate a hardware key had been updated... so wouldnt that mean media would have to change as well?

    Ugh.. I should have probably read up on it more. I know that on digg,etc that they had pasted that *one* key that was the key to the bigger scheme, not just an individual user..

    no idea...
  • $1500 for a Blu-Ray DVD player...it reminds of when DVD players first came out. I didn't get one of those at first either (even though I had a feeling the DVD would replace VHS eventually). I think I'm going to be enjoying some delayed gratification on this one as well. Also, that way I'm going to make sure which one wins out.
  • I think I missed part 2.

    Did you cover how HD-DVDs do the update for the firmware? As you know, both the first and second versions of the HD DVD encryption key were broken very quickly, and somehow magically the player was supposed to update to the new keys to be able to play new releases.

    Do you know if this updated key affects ability to play old hd-dvds, and or not being able to update also doing the same?

    If your hardware always has to update to the latest encryption key, then you are in a constant state of 'omg wtf'

    How do they handle this?

    And as I said before.. sony has like a 0% success rate with their formats. from beta, to MD, to magicgate (sony memory stick), to ATRAC to pretty much everything theyve *ever* created as far as media formats. Also add in there their awful times with CD protection (i.e. rootkit installs and bad DRM on music cds), and you have just a BAD track record.

    Which is why blu ray is doomed to fail.
  • Very interesting post. I used to be pretty interested in the format war but as I still don't have an HDTV to call my own, there's just too much back in forth in all this. Personally, I'll probably by a PS3 by summer of next year (because I'm a huge gamer) and I'll probably then be married to Blu-Ray. (Until HD-DVD wins the war that is. (#);) )
  • I'm confident that DVD will remain the standard for the next 12 months because it will take at least a year to slash 30% to 50% off the prices of a fangled Blue Ray player.

    An entry level Sony Blu Ray costs $1200! Thanks but no thanks.
  • I don't think neither one will reach mainstream soon or atleast defeat dvd.
  • blue ray is still not mainstream here in the UK
blog comments powered by Disqus