<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: What On Earth Is Going On With The Latest Google PageRank Update?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/</link> <description>The latest tech, mobile and gaming news</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:44:10 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: neil strauss</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-6/#comment-135767</link> <dc:creator>neil strauss</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:07:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-135767</guid> <description>Google done another PR toolbar update on 12th January 2008. I think the hype has died down on pr updates as less blogs are posting about it. PR as seen from the toolbar is outdated since PR is actually updated everyday. As webmasters we really should not bothered much about the toolbar PR as it does not determine traffic. What we want is keyword rankings, and an increasing PR is a result of a keyword ranking campaign. The only usage for toolbar PR is to sell text links, other advertisements, and gaining link partners. Though when caught selling links the PR would go down anyway!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google done another PR toolbar update on 12th January 2008. I think the hype has died down on pr updates as less blogs are posting about it.<br /> PR as seen from the toolbar is outdated since PR is actually updated everyday. As webmasters we really should not bothered much about the toolbar PR as it does not determine traffic. What we want is keyword rankings, and an increasing PR is a result of a keyword ranking campaign.<br /> The only usage for toolbar PR is to sell text links, other advertisements, and gaining link partners. Though when caught selling links the PR would go down anyway!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Of Google PageRank fluctuant</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-6/#comment-103728</link> <dc:creator>Of Google PageRank fluctuant</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:29:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-103728</guid> <description>[...] PageRank drops,  Extra: Google PR sequentially shake, still have the Blogger of a few English,  Connected Internet, Copyblogger, BlogoscopedWaited to report this matter. To the circumstance that this PageRank [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PageRank drops,  Extra: Google PR sequentially shake, still have the Blogger of a few English,  Connected Internet, Copyblogger, BlogoscopedWaited to report this matter. To the circumstance that this PageRank [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: D Web Design</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-6/#comment-101062</link> <dc:creator>D Web Design</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:43:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-101062</guid> <description>Has Google tagged the text links advertising websites as bad neighbours?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has Google tagged the text links advertising websites as bad neighbours?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: From Nothing At All To PR4 In Two Months &#124; Connected Internet</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-5/#comment-98808</link> <dc:creator>From Nothing At All To PR4 In Two Months &#124; Connected Internet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:11:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-98808</guid> <description>[...] November the much-maligned latest Google Pagerank was released, taken from an October snapshot. My site was granted a PR4, [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] November the much-maligned latest Google Pagerank was released, taken from an October snapshot. My site was granted a PR4, [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Google PRï¼Œåˆ°åº•å¦‚ä½•æ˜¯å¥½ &#124; ç”µå­å•†åŠ¡åšå®¢-å…³æ³¨ç”µå­å•†åŠ¡ã€ç½‘ç»œè¥é”€ä»¥åŠSEO</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-5/#comment-87167</link> <dc:creator>Google PRï¼Œåˆ°åº•å¦‚ä½•æ˜¯å¥½ &#124; ç”µå­å•†åŠ¡åšå®¢-å…³æ³¨ç”µå­å•†åŠ¡ã€ç½‘ç»œè¥é”€ä»¥åŠSEO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:32:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-87167</guid> <description>[...] è¿™ä¹ˆå¤šçŸ¥åç½‘ç«™çš„å¤§åž‹å˜åŠ¨ï¼Œçœ‹èµ·æ¥çœŸæ˜¯ä¸å¯æ€è®®ã€‚è¿™å…¶ä¸­åŒ…æ‹¬æˆ‘ç»å¸¸åŽ»çš„problogger.netã€copyblogger.comã€johnchow.comç­‰ï¼Œä¸€äº›è‹±æ–‡Bloggeré’ˆå¯¹æ­¤äº‹éƒ½å‘è¡¨äº†çœ‹æ³•ï¼Œå¦‚Connected Internetï¼Œcopybloggerï¼Œblogoscopedç­‰éƒ½æŠ¥é“äº†æ­¤äº‹ã€‚ [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] è¿™ä¹ˆå¤šçŸ¥åç½‘ç«™çš„å¤§åž‹å˜åŠ¨ï¼Œçœ‹èµ·æ¥çœŸæ˜¯ä¸å¯æ€è®®ã€‚è¿™å…¶ä¸­åŒ…æ‹¬æˆ‘ç»å¸¸åŽ»çš„problogger.netã€copyblogger.comã€johnchow.comç­‰ï¼Œä¸€äº›è‹±æ–‡Bloggeré’ˆå¯¹æ­¤äº‹éƒ½å‘è¡¨äº†çœ‹æ³•ï¼Œå¦‚Connected Internetï¼Œcopybloggerï¼Œblogoscopedç­‰éƒ½æŠ¥é“äº†æ­¤äº‹ã€‚ [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-5/#comment-86608</link> <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:40:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-86608</guid> <description>My main site has been a PR 3 for years now, I hoped Google would bumb me up at least to a 4</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My main site has been a PR 3 for years now, I hoped Google would bumb me up at least to a 4</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: La psicologia</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-5/#comment-86607</link> <dc:creator>La psicologia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 17:37:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-86607</guid> <description>I&#039;m happy with this update since my site stepped from pagerank 3 to pagerank 4!A strange update anyway... we&#039;ve waited for 6 months and now a lot of sites have lost 1-2 or eve 3 pr points!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happy with this update since my site stepped from pagerank 3 to pagerank 4!</p><p>A strange update anyway&#8230; we&#8217;ve waited for 6 months and now a lot of sites have lost 1-2 or eve 3 pr points!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tevine &#187; Post &#187; Google PR updates for this quarter: top 20 sites</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-5/#comment-86231</link> <dc:creator>Tevine &#187; Post &#187; Google PR updates for this quarter: top 20 sites</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:27:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-86231</guid> <description>[...] pages get an increase in pagerank? *Values for some websites were found using DigPagerank.com. ConnectedInternet.co.uk helped supply some values for some web [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pages get an increase in pagerank? *Values for some websites were found using DigPagerank.com. ConnectedInternet.co.uk helped supply some values for some web [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Breaking Google&#8217;s Stranglehold On The Internet &#124; Connected Internet</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-5/#comment-85712</link> <dc:creator>Breaking Google&#8217;s Stranglehold On The Internet &#124; Connected Internet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:11:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-85712</guid> <description>[...] backlash against Google&#8217;s recent moves was amazing to follow last week, and it&#8217;s been rare to see such little support for their [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] backlash against Google&#8217;s recent moves was amazing to follow last week, and it&#8217;s been rare to see such little support for their [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hair Loss Treatment</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-5/#comment-85257</link> <dc:creator>Hair Loss Treatment</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:58:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-85257</guid> <description>I agree with you if you are ranking well for your keywords then it really does not matter.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you if you are ranking well for your keywords then it really does not matter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Connected Internet Drops 3 Belt Sizes to Page Rank 3 in 24 Hours &#124; Connected Internet</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-5/#comment-84799</link> <dc:creator>Connected Internet Drops 3 Belt Sizes to Page Rank 3 in 24 Hours &#124; Connected Internet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:52:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-84799</guid> <description>[...] at least I&#8217;ll be drowning my &#8217;sorrows&#8217; this weekend in good company and toasting Google&#8217;s good health.Â  It took me 1 month to get a PR4,Â  a few more to get a [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least I&#8217;ll be drowning my &#8217;sorrows&#8217; this weekend in good company and toasting Google&#8217;s good health.Â  It took me 1 month to get a PR4,Â  a few more to get a [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Everton</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-5/#comment-84494</link> <dc:creator>Everton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:35:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-84494</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;hoho, you site still pr6, thatâ€™s ok.&lt;/blockquote&gt;shush, big brother Google is watching</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>hoho, you site still pr6, thatâ€™s ok.</p></blockquote><p>shush, big brother Google is watching</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: horisly</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-5/#comment-84493</link> <dc:creator>horisly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:32:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-84493</guid> <description>hoho, you site still pr6, that&#039;s ok.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hoho, you site still pr6, that&#8217;s ok.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-4/#comment-84486</link> <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:28:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-84486</guid> <description>@ Hair LossYes, its nice to be a PR 7-8, however if you are a PR2 and your #1 for your keywords who really cares.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Hair Loss</p><p>Yes, its nice to be a PR 7-8, however if you are a PR2 and your #1 for your keywords who really cares.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sasha T.</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-4/#comment-84483</link> <dc:creator>Sasha T.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:18:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-84483</guid> <description>I think it is stupid if they punish you for linking to some unrelated sites, I mean I want to link to everybody, why do I have to be punished?S.p.s. I&#039;m not affected with this update yet :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is stupid if they punish you for linking to some unrelated sites, I mean I want to link to everybody, why do I have to be punished?</p><p>S.</p><p>p.s. I&#8217;m not affected with this update yet :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Micah</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-4/#comment-84453</link> <dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:28:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-84453</guid> <description>I&#039;m not understanding what you mean Matthew...Problogger has a PR0? I checked earlier and it was 4. Besides that, you can check his stats right at the bottom of his webpage, and they are the same as before. So apprently it didn&#039;t do anything to harm his serps.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not understanding what you mean Matthew&#8230;Problogger has a PR0? I checked earlier and it was 4. Besides that, you can check his stats right at the bottom of his webpage, and they are the same as before. So apprently it didn&#8217;t do anything to harm his serps.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Serg V</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-4/#comment-84441</link> <dc:creator>Serg V</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 05:08:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-84441</guid> <description>I think if sites stay in SERP is not penalize. PR is nothing, if site receive big traffic, and people like content of this site, page rank may be 0 but popularity and weight of this site will big.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if sites stay in SERP is not penalize. PR is nothing, if site receive big traffic, and people like content of this site, page rank may be 0 but popularity and weight of this site will big.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Karthik</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-4/#comment-84436</link> <dc:creator>Karthik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 04:12:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-84436</guid> <description>@KlineThat&#039;s still important news - there are a couple of webmasters putting links inside JS to avoid Google penalizing them, but yet being able to send traffic. But if that is the case, I guess I&#039;m being paranoid here - what about the links on widgets like Adsense and Chitika and the like?Also, have you tried it to see if it works even if its on a separate file like you hint?They did start on a similar foot when they tried indexing URLs with parameters beyond the &quot;?&quot;. Now they can do it quite well - so I&#039;m guessing if they&#039;ve figured as much, its just a matter of time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kline</p><p>That&#8217;s still important news &#8211; there are a couple of webmasters putting links inside JS to avoid Google penalizing them, but yet being able to send traffic. But if that is the case, I guess I&#8217;m being paranoid here &#8211; what about the links on widgets like Adsense and Chitika and the like?</p><p>Also, have you tried it to see if it works even if its on a separate file like you hint?</p><p>They did start on a similar foot when they tried indexing URLs with parameters beyond the &#8220;?&#8221;. Now they can do it quite well &#8211; so I&#8217;m guessing if they&#8217;ve figured as much, its just a matter of time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kline</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-4/#comment-84353</link> <dc:creator>Kline</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:51:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-84353</guid> <description>@karthikYea, it certainly isn&#039;t intelligent by any means... but I can guarentee the urls they are hitting are linked from nowhere on the site except for in the JS (the js is on page, not in a .js file).  It is *quite* stupid in how it hits it..the code is likevar url = &#039;/ratings/rate.php?rating=&#039; + rating; ... send AJAX request code...and its just hitting /ratings/rate.php with out any parameters... and i am sure it is google doing it..  dunno if they are just looking for anything looking like a url and just being silly, or its starting attempts at looking at JS parsing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@karthik</p><p>Yea, it certainly isn&#8217;t intelligent by any means&#8230; but I can guarentee the urls they are hitting are linked from nowhere on the site except for in the JS (the js is on page, not in a .js file).  It is *quite* stupid in how it hits it..</p><p>the code is like</p><p> var url = &#8216;/ratings/rate.php?rating=&#8217; + rating;<br /> &#8230; send AJAX request code&#8230;</p><p>and its just hitting /ratings/rate.php with out any parameters&#8230; and i am sure it is google doing it..  dunno if they are just looking for anything looking like a url and just being silly, or its starting attempts at looking at JS parsing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-4/#comment-84000</link> <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:48:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-84000</guid> <description>What I really can&#039;t understand is that Google is not releasing a statement about the current situation. There is no transparency whatsoever.It surely looks to be like random picks but I could be wrong. I think that someone probably reported lots of those sites in the Webmaster Tools area to hurt the competition.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I really can&#8217;t understand is that Google is not releasing a statement about the current situation. There is no transparency whatsoever.</p><p>It surely looks to be like random picks but I could be wrong. I think that someone probably reported lots of those sites in the Webmaster Tools area to hurt the competition.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: HoTTest News Today: Google Did It Again!!! &#124; www.KPeBiz.com</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-4/#comment-83986</link> <dc:creator>HoTTest News Today: Google Did It Again!!! &#124; www.KPeBiz.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:32:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83986</guid> <description>[...] Here&#8217;s a summary of PR shakeup result extracted from Everton at Connected Internet. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here&#8217;s a summary of PR shakeup result extracted from Everton at Connected Internet. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hair Loss Treatment</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-4/#comment-83720</link> <dc:creator>Hair Loss Treatment</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:09:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83720</guid> <description>Richard I think that long green line makes a big difference to every site. Finally the whole game is all about BACKLINKS and PAGE RANK.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard I think that long green line makes a big difference to every site. Finally the whole game is all about BACKLINKS and PAGE RANK.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marcus The Lover</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-4/#comment-83716</link> <dc:creator>Marcus The Lover</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:42:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83716</guid> <description>Interlinking won&#039;t be detected if you host on different providers. Use varied services like rackspace, doteasy, godaddy, internic.And you fly under the radar</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interlinking won&#8217;t be detected if you host on different providers. Use varied services like rackspace, doteasy, godaddy, internic.</p><p>And you fly under the radar</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Googleæ•´é¡¿ç½‘ç»œ PRçˆ†è·Œ &#124; JooIT</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-3/#comment-83705</link> <dc:creator>Googleæ•´é¡¿ç½‘ç»œ PRçˆ†è·Œ &#124; JooIT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:11:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83705</guid> <description>[...] å‰é˜¶æ®µç‚’å¾—æ²¸æ²¸æ‰¬æ‰¬çš„Google Pagerank[æ³¨é‡Š1] å¤§è°ƒæ•´ä¸€è¯´æ³•ï¼Œç›®å‰ ä¹Ÿé€æ¸æ¸…æ™°äº†ã€‚è¯´æ³•æ˜¯è¿™æ ·çš„ï¼šæœ‰äº›çŸ¥æƒ…è€…è¯´Googleå‘çŽ°PRä½œå¼Šï¼Œä»˜è´¹é“¾æŽ¥çš„å¢žå¤šå¨èƒåˆ°Google PRçš„æƒå¨æ€§ (psï¼šPRæ˜¯Googleæœ€æ—©æˆåä½œå“,ç›®å‰ä¸ºæ­¢ï¼Œç”šè‡³è¿˜æ²¡æœ‰äººèƒ½å¤Ÿå®Œå…¨æžæ¸…PRçš„å®Œæ•´ç®—æ³•) Googleå°†å¯¹PRåšä¸€äº›è°ƒæ•´ã€‚å…·ä½“è°ƒæ•´æœ‰äº›è¯´ï¼Œå°†PRå–æ¶ˆ &#8212;æˆ‘è¯´ â€œä¸å¯èƒ½â€ï¼æœ‰äº›äººè¯´ï¼Œæƒ©ç½šä»˜è´¹é“¾æŽ¥ï¼Œä¹Ÿæœ‰äººè¯´â€œä¸å¯èƒ½â€ï¼Œå…¶åŽŸå› å°±åœ¨äºŽGoogleæ²¡æœ‰åŠžæ³•çŸ¥é“åˆ«äººæ˜¯å¦å¯¹ä½ çš„é“¾æŽ¥ä»˜è´¹ã€‚ç„¶è€Œï¼Œè¿™ä¸€å¤©åˆ°æ¥äº†ï¼šæ—©ä¸Šèµ·åºŠæ‰“å¼€iGoogleå°±çœ‹åˆ°æ»¡å¤©çš„å–Šå†¤å’Œå¯¹Google PRçš„æ£æµ‹&#8230;. è¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿˜æœ‰è¿™é‡Œ&#8230;.. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] å‰é˜¶æ®µç‚’å¾—æ²¸æ²¸æ‰¬æ‰¬çš„Google Pagerank[æ³¨é‡Š1] å¤§è°ƒæ•´ä¸€è¯´æ³•ï¼Œç›®å‰ ä¹Ÿé€æ¸æ¸…æ™°äº†ã€‚è¯´æ³•æ˜¯è¿™æ ·çš„ï¼šæœ‰äº›çŸ¥æƒ…è€…è¯´Googleå‘çŽ°PRä½œå¼Šï¼Œä»˜è´¹é“¾æŽ¥çš„å¢žå¤šå¨èƒåˆ°Google PRçš„æƒå¨æ€§ (psï¼šPRæ˜¯Googleæœ€æ—©æˆåä½œå“,ç›®å‰ä¸ºæ­¢ï¼Œç”šè‡³è¿˜æ²¡æœ‰äººèƒ½å¤Ÿå®Œå…¨æžæ¸…PRçš„å®Œæ•´ç®—æ³•) Googleå°†å¯¹PRåšä¸€äº›è°ƒæ•´ã€‚å…·ä½“è°ƒæ•´æœ‰äº›è¯´ï¼Œå°†PRå–æ¶ˆ &#8212;æˆ‘è¯´ â€œä¸å¯èƒ½â€ï¼æœ‰äº›äººè¯´ï¼Œæƒ©ç½šä»˜è´¹é“¾æŽ¥ï¼Œä¹Ÿæœ‰äººè¯´â€œä¸å¯èƒ½â€ï¼Œå…¶åŽŸå› å°±åœ¨äºŽGoogleæ²¡æœ‰åŠžæ³•çŸ¥é“åˆ«äººæ˜¯å¦å¯¹ä½ çš„é“¾æŽ¥ä»˜è´¹ã€‚ç„¶è€Œï¼Œè¿™ä¸€å¤©åˆ°æ¥äº†ï¼šæ—©ä¸Šèµ·åºŠæ‰“å¼€iGoogleå°±çœ‹åˆ°æ»¡å¤©çš„å–Šå†¤å’Œå¯¹Google PRçš„æ£æµ‹&#8230;. è¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿™é‡Œï¼Œè¿˜æœ‰è¿™é‡Œ&#8230;.. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Everton</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-3/#comment-83695</link> <dc:creator>Everton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:02:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83695</guid> <description>Google must love it that we spend all day talking about what we think they do, so they can do the exact opposite!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google must love it that we spend all day talking about what we think they do, so they can do the exact opposite!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Post-Buzz: Money Buzz Online. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hello, my name is Google.</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-3/#comment-83685</link> <dc:creator>Post-Buzz: Money Buzz Online. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hello, my name is Google.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:25:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83685</guid> <description>[...] you blame me? Because of that pagerank? Oh please&#8230; I&#8217;m not take all of your pagerank. Just a &#8220;little bit&#8221; of [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you blame me? Because of that pagerank? Oh please&#8230; I&#8217;m not take all of your pagerank. Just a &#8220;little bit&#8221; of [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Harishankar</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-3/#comment-83682</link> <dc:creator>Harishankar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:42:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83682</guid> <description>ok, now another prediction... Bunch of sites that interlink among themselves where everyone sell links, google has a new algo to find these sites and measure these 2 factors and penalize them or make their interlinking invalid....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, now another prediction&#8230; Bunch of sites that interlink among themselves where everyone sell links, google has a new algo to find these sites and measure these 2 factors and penalize them or make their interlinking invalid&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Harishankar</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-3/#comment-83681</link> <dc:creator>Harishankar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:30:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83681</guid> <description>But this time, even blogs that are particularly pointing on specific keyword are also hit... might be google is not happy with people who sell links to be simple...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But this time, even blogs that are particularly pointing on specific keyword are also hit&#8230; might be google is not happy with people who sell links to be simple&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Harishankar</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-3/#comment-83679</link> <dc:creator>Harishankar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:14:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83679</guid> <description>With a little research I did on few sites I usually read, I came to a conclusion like this: Sites that have wide spread content with no common point of target, and having bunch of irrelevant links on their pages, are moved down in PR. To make it simple blogs which are specific to a particular topic, say about mobile games or say its about mobile phones are not suffering but sites like this blog which have each page targeting different keywords suffer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a little research I did on few sites I usually read, I came to a conclusion like this: Sites that have wide spread content with no common point of target, and having bunch of irrelevant links on their pages, are moved down in PR. To make it simple blogs which are specific to a particular topic, say about mobile games or say its about mobile phones are not suffering but sites like this blog which have each page targeting different keywords suffer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joseph Plazo</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-3/#comment-83603</link> <dc:creator>Joseph Plazo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 02:42:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83603</guid> <description>Those blogs dropping to PR4&#039;s not so bad. I fell to PR4 on the first quarter PR update this year, but my search engine ranking positions for the critical keywords I target increased!There seems to be little correlation between PR and SERPs these days.Maybe they should roll out trustrank in force and ditch PR?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those blogs dropping to PR4&#8217;s not so bad. I fell to PR4 on the first quarter PR update this year, but my search engine ranking positions for the critical keywords I target increased!</p><p>There seems to be little correlation between PR and SERPs these days.</p><p>Maybe they should roll out trustrank in force and ditch PR?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marcus the Lover</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-3/#comment-83538</link> <dc:creator>Marcus the Lover</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 01:26:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83538</guid> <description>I can confirm this. More than half in my blogging community dropped from PR 4 or 5 to PR 2 to 3. This is simply because we espouse text-link-ads and paid links.One of them even runs a paid subdirectory like iwebtool on his blog. His site lost PR for the same reason.I&#039;m planning to stop advertisng TLA and paid advertising by next week.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can confirm this. More than half in my blogging community dropped from PR 4 or 5 to PR 2 to 3. This is simply because we espouse text-link-ads and paid links.</p><p>One of them even runs a paid subdirectory like iwebtool on his blog. His site lost PR for the same reason.</p><p>I&#8217;m planning to stop advertisng TLA and paid advertising by next week.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave Starr</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-3/#comment-83447</link> <dc:creator>Dave Starr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:47:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83447</guid> <description>This will be a rather interesting puzzle over the next few days.  Of particular interest are Darren&#039;s comments a few hours back.  Problogger.net is arguably at the top of nearly every list ... and they don&#039;t sell links or use TLA, TNX, BlogRush or whatever the current &quot;don&#039;t do&quot; of the day is.  He drops to 4.  John Chow, a very close second to ProBlogger by many measurements ... and who, by his own self description is evil ... he&#039;ll sell anything that isn&#039;t nailed down ... also drops to a &quot;4&quot;.  The logic, if there is any, escapes me.In reality, if you aren&#039;t making a career out of TLA is, who cares.  I have a PR 2 blog that I am reviving from the near dead.  What difference does PR mean to me?The fact that I have one of my desired search terms on the front page of the SERPs definitely means something, though.  SERPS results certainly aren&#039;t driven by PR as some seem to think, I see plenty sites with higher PR who rank below me for my term.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will be a rather interesting puzzle over the next few days.  Of particular interest are Darren&#8217;s comments a few hours back.  Problogger.net is arguably at the top of nearly every list &#8230; and they don&#8217;t sell links or use TLA, TNX, BlogRush or whatever the current &#8220;don&#8217;t do&#8221; of the day is.  He drops to 4.  John Chow, a very close second to ProBlogger by many measurements &#8230; and who, by his own self description is evil &#8230; he&#8217;ll sell anything that isn&#8217;t nailed down &#8230; also drops to a &#8220;4&#8243;.  The logic, if there is any, escapes me.</p><p>In reality, if you aren&#8217;t making a career out of TLA is, who cares.  I have a PR 2 blog that I am reviving from the near dead.  What difference does PR mean to me?</p><p> The fact that I have one of my desired search terms on the front page of the SERPs definitely means something, though.  SERPS results certainly aren&#8217;t driven by PR as some seem to think, I see plenty sites with higher PR who rank below me for my term.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Micah</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-3/#comment-83426</link> <dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:30:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83426</guid> <description>So far, it doesn&#039;t look like the PR drop has dropped traffic much, if at all. (for the blogs I can check their traffic anyway). Just don&#039;t be linking to any shady sites or linkfarms...or be getting any links from them either. Other than that, just keep on pumping out good posts, and you should be fine.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, it doesn&#8217;t look like the PR drop has dropped traffic much, if at all. (for the blogs I can check their traffic anyway). Just don&#8217;t be linking to any shady sites or linkfarms&#8230;or be getting any links from them either. Other than that, just keep on pumping out good posts, and you should be fine.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-2/#comment-83328</link> <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:55:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83328</guid> <description>Who cares about PR, even though the long green button does do wonders for everyone&#039;s ego. As long as your still in your keyword placement, I wouldn&#039;t really care.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about PR, even though the long green button does do wonders for everyone&#8217;s ego. As long as your still in your keyword placement, I wouldn&#8217;t really care.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sofna</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-2/#comment-83323</link> <dc:creator>Sofna</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:51:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83323</guid> <description>I just read a post on this earlier as well.  The blog author talked about how every site he had with TLA dropped in PR, but suprisingly has stayed the same in the SERPs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read a post on this earlier as well.  The blog author talked about how every site he had with TLA dropped in PR, but suprisingly has stayed the same in the SERPs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mathew Browne</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-2/#comment-83263</link> <dc:creator>Mathew Browne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:31:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83263</guid> <description>Well, clearly there&#039;s no consistency, and the obvious reason for Google downgrading the toolbar PR is that such sites are such attractive prospects to sell text links. Matt Cutts did warn that they&#039;re cracking down on this, it seems in many cases however that this is a pre-emptive strike. Pagerank is almost certainly now meaningless - it was never a foolproof metric of any site&#039;s authority, this just cements that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, clearly there&#8217;s no consistency, and the obvious reason for Google downgrading the toolbar PR is that such sites are such attractive prospects to sell text links. Matt Cutts did warn that they&#8217;re cracking down on this, it seems in many cases however that this is a pre-emptive strike. Pagerank is almost certainly now meaningless &#8211; it was never a foolproof metric of any site&#8217;s authority, this just cements that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Everton</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-2/#comment-83236</link> <dc:creator>Everton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:07:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83236</guid> <description>@MathewI think that just proves how random the whole system is, rather than the directory or toolbar being &#039;accurate&#039;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mathew</p><p>I think that just proves how random the whole system is, rather than the directory or toolbar being &#8216;accurate&#8217;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mathew Browne</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-2/#comment-83223</link> <dc:creator>Mathew Browne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:49:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83223</guid> <description>Check that out actually - most of those blogs with entries in the Google Directory are mostly all still showing their old PRs there, with the exception of Autoblog (PR7) and ProBlogger (PR0!)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check that out actually &#8211; most of those blogs with entries in the Google Directory are mostly all still showing their old PRs there, with the exception of Autoblog (PR7) and ProBlogger (PR0!)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mathew Browne</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-2/#comment-83211</link> <dc:creator>Mathew Browne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:39:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83211</guid> <description>They may have just changed your visible (toolbar) PR as means to deter link selling. Your real PR might be different - Google Directory has different PR values to toolbar PR - see http://www.mathewbrowne.com/check-your-current-pagerank/ for further details</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They may have just changed your visible (toolbar) PR as means to deter link selling. Your real PR might be different &#8211; Google Directory has different PR values to toolbar PR &#8211; see <a href="http://www.mathewbrowne.com/check-your-current-pagerank/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mathewbrowne.com/check-your-current-pagerank/</a> for further details</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Karthik</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-2/#comment-83198</link> <dc:creator>Karthik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:20:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83198</guid> <description>@Kline I&#039;ve heard about Google being able to parse flash files to a certain extent - can they do it with JS too now? This would be big news!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kline<br /> I&#8217;ve heard about Google being able to parse flash files to a certain extent &#8211; can they do it with JS too now? This would be big news!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kline</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-2/#comment-83189</link> <dc:creator>Kline</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:10:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83189</guid> <description>&quot;Blogrush is Javascript, so you wonâ€™t have to worry about it affecting SEO &quot;You know what&#039;s amusing?  Google has started hitting javascript recently.  I shit you not.  Nothing complex, it&#039;s pretty bad in what it chooses, but I&#039;ll be damned if google isnt hitting JS referenced AJAX calls for a ratings engine I wrote for one of my sites.  I&#039;ve seen it in other places, and verified that the URL it was hitting was only refereneced from within javascript.  Still very rudimentary parsing of JS, but it is doing it all the same.Probably in the same way they look at flash files for obvious linking, but do it poorly.the drop does not actually seem to have had any effect on rankings imo...again ill say.. its weird that they&#039;ve changed the rankings on existing pages, but it was not a full on pagerank update.  I have about 20 domains with enough promotion behind them to kill a yak, and still not even showing a 0 PR. (all tests of various ranking schemes i&#039;ve come up with to try out).also have legit domains that still arent showing any change, not that I really expect them.. takes some time to move up past 4-5</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Blogrush is Javascript, so you wonâ€™t have to worry about it affecting SEO &#8221;</p><p>You know what&#8217;s amusing?  Google has started hitting javascript recently.  I shit you not.  Nothing complex, it&#8217;s pretty bad in what it chooses, but I&#8217;ll be damned if google isnt hitting JS referenced AJAX calls for a ratings engine I wrote for one of my sites.  I&#8217;ve seen it in other places, and verified that the URL it was hitting was only refereneced from within javascript.  Still very rudimentary parsing of JS, but it is doing it all the same.</p><p>Probably in the same way they look at flash files for obvious linking, but do it poorly.</p><p>the drop does not actually seem to have had any effect on rankings imo&#8230;</p><p>again ill say.. its weird that they&#8217;ve changed the rankings on existing pages, but it was not a full on pagerank update.  I have about 20 domains with enough promotion behind them to kill a yak, and still not even showing a 0 PR. (all tests of various ranking schemes i&#8217;ve come up with to try out).</p><p>also have legit domains that still arent showing any change, not that I really expect them.. takes some time to move up past 4-5</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Eaves</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-2/#comment-83142</link> <dc:creator>David Eaves</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:19:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83142</guid> <description>These sites have got off lightly compared to some, the loss of PageRank will not effect their rankings, other sites deemed less important like womenmumbles.com have been dropped over 40 places in the search results for their own names.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These sites have got off lightly compared to some, the loss of PageRank will not effect their rankings, other sites deemed less important like womenmumbles.com have been dropped over 40 places in the search results for their own names.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-2/#comment-83136</link> <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:13:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83136</guid> <description>kline, didn&#039;t about that. I guess I could take down my competition.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kline, didn&#8217;t about that. I guess I could take down my competition.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Karthik</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-1/#comment-83120</link> <dc:creator>Karthik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:54:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83120</guid> <description>&gt;&gt;I wonder what the policy will be about other sidebar content like BlogRush widgets, various other buttons &amp; badges, site meters etc?Blogrush is Javascript, so you won&#039;t have to worry about it affecting SEO - probably the only thing John Reese did right about it - so far. I&#039;m still hopeful about their v2 release.&gt;&gt;It seems PageRank is no longer a measure of how relevant your site is (was it ever?), itâ€™s now a measure of how well you abide by Googleâ€™s rules.I believe you&#039;ve nailed it there - bang on.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;I wonder what the policy will be about other sidebar content like BlogRush widgets, various other buttons &amp; badges, site meters etc?</p><p>Blogrush is Javascript, so you won&#8217;t have to worry about it affecting SEO &#8211; probably the only thing John Reese did right about it &#8211; so far. I&#8217;m still hopeful about their v2 release.</p><p>&gt;&gt;It seems PageRank is no longer a measure of how relevant your site is (was it ever?), itâ€™s now a measure of how well you abide by Googleâ€™s rules.</p><p>I believe you&#8217;ve nailed it there &#8211; bang on.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-1/#comment-83104</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:38:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83104</guid> <description>Whatever their motivation behind doing it, they&#039;re rattling a heck of a lot of cages at the moment and they&#039;re not publicly explaining their reasons behind it. Another case of Google FUD.Let&#039;s put paid links to one side, if, as has been suggested, that it&#039;s down to an aggressive outbund linking policy, why not say so?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever their motivation behind doing it, they&#8217;re rattling a heck of a lot of cages at the moment and they&#8217;re not publicly explaining their reasons behind it. Another case of Google FUD.</p><p>Let&#8217;s put paid links to one side, if, as has been suggested, that it&#8217;s down to an aggressive outbund linking policy, why not say so?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kline</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-1/#comment-83098</link> <dc:creator>Kline</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:30:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83098</guid> <description>Richard -&gt; Nope, but you probably wouldn&#039;t get any benefit either.Google/Matt Cutts have stated time and time again that outside factors cannot *hurt* you, they can only fail to help you.If buying links could get you penalized, I could launch a smear campaign, buying only the worst links I could find, and link to my competitor.  It would be like a reverse googlebomb.It makes me kind of want to rethink using tnx.net, since the site quality for those links you are placing on your site is absolute garbage.  I&#039;ll probbaly keep it up on one of my lesser built up sites.. just for giggles..</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard -&gt; Nope, but you probably wouldn&#8217;t get any benefit either.</p><p>Google/Matt Cutts have stated time and time again that outside factors cannot *hurt* you, they can only fail to help you.</p><p>If buying links could get you penalized, I could launch a smear campaign, buying only the worst links I could find, and link to my competitor.  It would be like a reverse googlebomb.</p><p>It makes me kind of want to rethink using tnx.net, since the site quality for those links you are placing on your site is absolute garbage.  I&#8217;ll probbaly keep it up on one of my lesser built up sites.. just for giggles..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-1/#comment-83062</link> <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:46:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83062</guid> <description>Thats to bad. What if you were to buy links, would you also be penalized.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats to bad. What if you were to buy links, would you also be penalized.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kline</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-1/#comment-83061</link> <dc:creator>Kline</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:45:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83061</guid> <description>Well, these sites shouldnt be surprised by this drop..Just look at http://www.autoblog.com/The bottom like 20% of the long page is about *55* links out to other unrelated sites in their network.  For all intents and purposes they are paid links.. to themself.  True, a company can plug its own stuff all it wants, but this seems a bit extensive.Google cannot tell if a site is selling links.  Impossible for them to tell.  But it has always maintained that linking to bad sites hurts you.  How can you be a &#039;highly respected&#039; site on topic X when you link out to unrelated stuff 55 times on your main page alone.  It makes sense in all honesty.  I doubt it was &#039;penalties&#039; per say, but likely a change in the algorithm...Kinda weird that the pagerank update still isnt a proper update....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, these sites shouldnt be surprised by this drop..</p><p>Just look at <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.autoblog.com/</a></p><p>The bottom like 20% of the long page is about *55* links out to other unrelated sites in their network.  For all intents and purposes they are paid links.. to themself.  True, a company can plug its own stuff all it wants, but this seems a bit extensive.</p><p>Google cannot tell if a site is selling links.  Impossible for them to tell.  But it has always maintained that linking to bad sites hurts you.  How can you be a &#8216;highly respected&#8217; site on topic X when you link out to unrelated stuff 55 times on your main page alone.  It makes sense in all honesty.  I doubt it was &#8216;penalties&#8217; per say, but likely a change in the algorithm&#8230;</p><p>Kinda weird that the pagerank update still isnt a proper update&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Everton</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-1/#comment-83008</link> <dc:creator>Everton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:36:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83008</guid> <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Is Google going too far? Probably. Yes. But they let us get away with murder up til now. It will balance out and they will relax their guidelines a bit&lt;/blockquote&gt;Lets hope so.  If they are going to start compiling all non-relevant links then the pain is going to continue for a long time, especially if you&#039;ve been a &#039;good&#039; blogger and leaving your sig all around the web.....One potential side benefit.  I&#039;m still a 6, so maybe I&#039;ll start stealing some of engadget and friends&#039; traffic ;-)I for one am not going to change my behaviour.  I never understood Google&#039;s alogrithm before, so why should I suddenly act different???</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is Google going too far? Probably. Yes. But they let us get away with murder up til now. It will balance out and they will relax their guidelines a bit</p></blockquote><p>Lets hope so.  If they are going to start compiling all non-relevant links then the pain is going to continue for a long time, especially if you&#8217;ve been a &#8216;good&#8217; blogger and leaving your sig all around the web&#8230;..</p><p>One potential side benefit.  I&#8217;m still a 6, so maybe I&#8217;ll start stealing some of engadget and friends&#8217; traffic ;-)</p><p>I for one am not going to change my behaviour.  I never understood Google&#8217;s alogrithm before, so why should I suddenly act different???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mlankton</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/comment-page-1/#comment-83003</link> <dc:creator>mlankton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:27:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2007/10/24/what-on-earth-is-going-on-with-the-latest-google-pagerank-update/#comment-83003</guid> <description>I understand how people are going to be up in arms over this, but is anyone surprised?We&#039;ve all done things to manipulate our site&#039;s authority, I&#039;m certainly not innocent. I don&#039;t sell text links or participate in link building schemes, but I have thousands of forum .sig links and blog comment links. I will continue to use both even if they&#039;re worthless now, because forums create a lot of my traffic, and I have grown to like frequenting blogs and commenting.Is Google going too far? Probably. Yes. But they let us get away with murder up til now. It will balance out and they will relax their guidelines a bit, but some long-used seo techniques are probably done for.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand how people are going to be up in arms over this, but is anyone surprised?</p><p>We&#8217;ve all done things to manipulate our site&#8217;s authority, I&#8217;m certainly not innocent. I don&#8217;t sell text links or participate in link building schemes, but I have thousands of forum .sig links and blog comment links. I will continue to use both even if they&#8217;re worthless now, because forums create a lot of my traffic, and I have grown to like frequenting blogs and commenting.</p><p>Is Google going too far? Probably. Yes. But they let us get away with murder up til now. It will balance out and they will relax their guidelines a bit, but some long-used seo techniques are probably done for.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/62 queries in 0.028 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn2.connectedinternet.co.uk

Served from: host.connectedinternet.co.uk @ 2010-03-16 02:10:42 -->