Comments on: Time To Be Sneaky! http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/ Updated daily with the latest news, tips, tweaks, social networking, wordpress tips & tweaks, windows optimization help and more. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:55:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Buy Facebook Fans http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/comment-page-2/#comment-702776 Buy Facebook Fans Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:40:29 +0000 http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/#comment-702776 <strong>Sources...</strong> [...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]... Sources…

[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]…

]]> By: aj discala http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/comment-page-2/#comment-315483 aj discala Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:28:35 +0000 http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/#comment-315483 <strong>Great website...</strong> [...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]…... Great website…

[...]we like to honor many other internet sites on the web, even if they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Under are some webpages worth checking out[...]……

]]> By: My Blog Title http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/comment-page-2/#comment-299513 My Blog Title Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:42:57 +0000 http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/#comment-299513 <strong>Title...</strong> This is my Excerpt... Title…

This is my Excerpt…

]]> By: Articlesgarage.com http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/comment-page-1/#comment-145425 Articlesgarage.com Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:48:41 +0000 http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/#comment-145425 Are these tools still effective these days if we consider how the search engines are claiming? Or we have no idea how effective they still are? :D Are these tools still effective these days if we consider how the search engines are claiming?
Or we have no idea how effective they still are? :D

]]> By: Articlesgarage.com http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/comment-page-1/#comment-227946 Articlesgarage.com Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:48:00 +0000 http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/#comment-227946 Are these tools still effective these days if we consider how the search engines are claiming? Or we have no idea how effective they still are? :D Are these tools still effective these days if we consider how the search engines are claiming?
Or we have no idea how effective they still are? :D

]]> By: Amanda http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/comment-page-1/#comment-138176 Amanda Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:25:29 +0000 http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/#comment-138176 Sounds too good to be true - if you think that Messer <a href="http://www.google.com/your-busted" rel="nofollow">Googlies</a>will give any longevity to these tactics think again. Can you give us a site example to check the pagewank claims? Sounds too good to be true – if you think that Messer Googlieswill give any longevity to these tactics think again.

Can you give us a site example to check the pagewank claims?

]]> By: Amanda http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/comment-page-1/#comment-227945 Amanda Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:25:00 +0000 http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/#comment-227945 Sounds too good to be true - if you think that Messer <a href="http://www.google.com/your-busted" rel="nofollow">Googlies</a>will give any longevity to these tactics think again. Can you give us a site example to check the pagewank claims? Sounds too good to be true – if you think that Messer Googlieswill give any longevity to these tactics think again.

Can you give us a site example to check the pagewank claims?

]]> By: Matt http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/comment-page-1/#comment-137970 Matt Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:39:16 +0000 http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/#comment-137970 The critic: you are missing the point with these tools. The sites are not supposed to rank for years. Is just a quick method to make some money. But I don't know how much you can make with a site full of scraped duplicate content... The critic: you are missing the point with these tools. The sites are not supposed to rank for years. Is just a quick method to make some money. But I don’t know how much you can make with a site full of scraped duplicate content…

]]> By: Matt http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/comment-page-1/#comment-227944 Matt Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:39:00 +0000 http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/#comment-227944 The critic: you are missing the point with these tools. The sites are not supposed to rank for years. Is just a quick method to make some money. But I don't know how much you can make with a site full of scraped duplicate content... The critic: you are missing the point with these tools. The sites are not supposed to rank for years. Is just a quick method to make some money. But I don’t know how much you can make with a site full of scraped duplicate content…

]]> By: The Critic http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/comment-page-1/#comment-137896 The Critic Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:45:25 +0000 http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/#comment-137896 I wouldn't touch Traffic Equalizer with a ten foot pole. Back in 2005, my bud had 20 sites all running TE... making me $100+ a day in ad revenues. Then then 2006 came. Google disabled his adsense account and dropped the sites to PR N/A RSS Equalizer is okay though I wouldn’t touch Traffic Equalizer with a ten foot pole. Back in 2005, my bud had 20 sites all running TE… making me $100+ a day in ad revenues.

Then then 2006 came. Google disabled his adsense account and dropped the sites to PR N/A

RSS Equalizer is okay though

]]> By: The Critic http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/comment-page-1/#comment-227943 The Critic Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:45:00 +0000 http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/#comment-227943 I wouldn't touch Traffic Equalizer with a ten foot pole. Back in 2005, my bud had 20 sites all running TE... making me $100+ a day in ad revenues. Then then 2006 came. Google disabled his adsense account and dropped the sites to PR N/A RSS Equalizer is okay though I wouldn’t touch Traffic Equalizer with a ten foot pole. Back in 2005, my bud had 20 sites all running TE… making me $100+ a day in ad revenues.

Then then 2006 came. Google disabled his adsense account and dropped the sites to PR N/A

RSS Equalizer is okay though

]]> By: Kline http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/comment-page-1/#comment-137057 Kline Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:55:20 +0000 http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/#comment-137057 Some free examples would be more appreciated? The first two are probably a whopping 200 lines of code each. I'm sure most people could write them in an afternoon.... I dont have a problem with 10 dollar scripts, but 80-90 is a range that I get a bit skeptical about the amount of gain i'll see on spam domains. Most of my spam domains (er... if i were to ever dabble in such things) only make like $5/mo each when fully running... so 80 is quite a large hit for something that may be google blocked in amonth or so... ArticleBot looks to probabbly just use markov to randomize words... Some free examples would be more appreciated? The first two are probably a whopping 200 lines of code each. I’m sure most people could write them in an afternoon…. I dont have a problem with 10 dollar scripts, but 80-90 is a range that I get a bit skeptical about the amount of gain i’ll see on spam domains. Most of my spam domains (er… if i were to ever dabble in such things) only make like $5/mo each when fully running… so 80 is quite a large hit for something that may be google blocked in amonth or so…

ArticleBot looks to probabbly just use markov to randomize words…

]]> By: Kline http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/comment-page-1/#comment-227942 Kline Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:55:00 +0000 http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/01/15/time-to-be-sneaky/#comment-227942 Some free examples would be more appreciated? The first two are probably a whopping 200 lines of code each. I'm sure most people could write them in an afternoon.... I dont have a problem with 10 dollar scripts, but 80-90 is a range that I get a bit skeptical about the amount of gain i'll see on spam domains. Most of my spam domains (er... if i were to ever dabble in such things) only make like $5/mo each when fully running... so 80 is quite a large hit for something that may be google blocked in amonth or so... ArticleBot looks to probabbly just use markov to randomize words... Some free examples would be more appreciated? The first two are probably a whopping 200 lines of code each. I’m sure most people could write them in an afternoon…. I dont have a problem with 10 dollar scripts, but 80-90 is a range that I get a bit skeptical about the amount of gain i’ll see on spam domains. Most of my spam domains (er… if i were to ever dabble in such things) only make like $5/mo each when fully running… so 80 is quite a large hit for something that may be google blocked in amonth or so…

ArticleBot looks to probabbly just use markov to randomize words…

]]>