<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Breaking News: Microsoft Bids $44.6bn for Yahoo!</title> <atom:link href="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/</link> <description>The latest tech, mobile and gaming news</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Balanced News Blog</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/comment-page-2/#comment-146978</link> <dc:creator>Balanced News Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:59:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/#comment-146978</guid> <description>&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft Makes Offer for Yahoo!...&lt;/strong&gt;Microsoft has offered to buy the search engine company Yahoo for $44.6bn (Â£22.4bn) in cash and shares. ......</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Microsoft Makes Offer for Yahoo!&#8230;</strong></p><p>Microsoft has offered to buy the search engine company Yahoo for $44.6bn (Â£22.4bn) in cash and shares.<br /> &#8230;&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Yahoo Board Rejects Microsoft&#8217;s Bid &#124; Connected Internet</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/comment-page-2/#comment-146078</link> <dc:creator>Yahoo Board Rejects Microsoft&#8217;s Bid &#124; Connected Internet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:49:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/#comment-146078</guid> <description>[...] to the Wall Street Journal, Yahoo&#8217;s board will be declining Microsoft&#8217;s offer of $44.6 billion [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the Wall Street Journal, Yahoo&#8217;s board will be declining Microsoft&#8217;s offer of $44.6 billion [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: On Microsoft, Google and Fear &#124; Connected Internet</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/comment-page-2/#comment-145205</link> <dc:creator>On Microsoft, Google and Fear &#124; Connected Internet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:44:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/#comment-145205</guid> <description>[...] news regarding Microsoft&#8217;s offer to buy out Yahoo shouldn&#8217;t surprise anyone. LiveSearch is almost irrelevant as a search engine, and MSN has [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news regarding Microsoft&#8217;s offer to buy out Yahoo shouldn&#8217;t surprise anyone. LiveSearch is almost irrelevant as a search engine, and MSN has [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Smackall</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-145143</link> <dc:creator>Smackall</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 04:43:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/#comment-145143</guid> <description>From my point of view. MS is not planning to drive search Engine traffic from yahoo, but its trying to use the good traffic with its advertising strategy. Speaking about Yahoo, its not a search engine company, as you people speak about the number of visitors it drives into your site. Might be MS has a mega plan to combine all the services into live.com and make live as a better place. :) Ofcourse their plan would be to earn more money from their advertisers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my point of view. MS is not planning to drive search Engine traffic from yahoo, but its trying to use the good traffic with its advertising strategy. Speaking about Yahoo, its not a search engine company, as you people speak about the number of visitors it drives into your site. Might be MS has a mega plan to combine all the services into live.com and make live as a better place. :) Ofcourse their plan would be to earn more money from their advertisers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robbert</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-145129</link> <dc:creator>Robbert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:23:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/#comment-145129</guid> <description>I think it&#039;s an interesting move by Microsoft. But I still don&#039;t think they could ever touch Google&#039;s dominance. In the Netherlands Google holds a market share of 94%.MSN, or Live Search, only has some market share, because they implement it in every single application.But maybe it will cause some nice competition in the rest of the world!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s an interesting move by Microsoft. But I still don&#8217;t think they could ever touch Google&#8217;s dominance. In the Netherlands Google holds a market share of 94%.</p><p>MSN, or Live Search, only has some market share, because they implement it in every single application.</p><p>But maybe it will cause some nice competition in the rest of the world!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kline</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-145118</link> <dc:creator>Kline</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:25:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/#comment-145118</guid> <description>Oh, and live.com follows yahoo&#039;s traffic type, with 77% in mail, and 2% in search (as does msn).So, while all these sites are big, they all primarily trafficed by mail users.Google will still dominate them in search traffic by 6x which is a lot of ground to catch up.  Though, I daresay it will probably be profitable in mail ads alone, especially since they are the ones brokering the ads (unlike the facebook/msn deal where msn takes 40% off the top)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and live.com follows yahoo&#8217;s traffic type, with 77% in mail, and 2% in search (as does msn).</p><p>So, while all these sites are big, they all primarily trafficed by mail users.</p><p>Google will still dominate them in search traffic by 6x which is a lot of ground to catch up.  Though, I daresay it will probably be profitable in mail ads alone, especially since they are the ones brokering the ads (unlike the facebook/msn deal where msn takes 40% off the top)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kline</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-145117</link> <dc:creator>Kline</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:13:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/#comment-145117</guid> <description>You are correct in that referrals from yahoo are soo small compared to google, even if you add in MS, it doesnt add up.stats (rounded): google 13,000 yahoo 800 live 700 msn 400however, according to alexa (yes there are issues, but on a scale this big it becomes more accurate) yahoo and google are neck and neck and add in live/msn and you are easily on top in terms of largest ad generating space on the web ;)Ive always wondered how yahoo could keep so close to google on alexa.. seemed strange to me..  maybe yahoo mail, and some of the non search properties are really quite big.oh, check this out Where people go on Yahoo.com: mail.yahoo.com 46% search.yahoo.com 14%which would explain why we get no referrals, but the site is still enormous.google on the other hand is flipped google.com  (search) 59% mail.google.com 19%Interesting, eh?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct in that referrals from yahoo are soo small compared to google, even if you add in MS, it doesnt add up.</p><p>stats (rounded):<br /> google 13,000<br /> yahoo 800<br /> live 700<br /> msn 400</p><p>however, according to alexa (yes there are issues, but on a scale this big it becomes more accurate) yahoo and google are neck and neck and add in live/msn and you are easily on top in terms of largest ad generating space on the web ;)Ive always wondered how yahoo could keep so close to google on alexa.. seemed strange to me..  maybe yahoo mail, and some of the non search properties are really quite big.</p><p>oh, check this out<br /> Where people go on Yahoo.com:<br /> mail.yahoo.com 46%<br /> search.yahoo.com 14%</p><p>which would explain why we get no referrals, but the site is still enormous.</p><p>google on the other hand is flipped<br /> google.com  (search) 59%<br /> mail.google.com 19%</p><p>Interesting, eh?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mlankton</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-145102</link> <dc:creator>mlankton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:59:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/#comment-145102</guid> <description>ps. I&#039;m getting first page serps on Yahoo as well as Google.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps.<br /> I&#8217;m getting first page serps on Yahoo as well as Google.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mlankton</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-145101</link> <dc:creator>mlankton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:58:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/#comment-145101</guid> <description>How many people a day does Yahoo send you? Google?Maybe it&#039;s me, but my site and my friend JD&#039;s site get a flood of people from Google, but only a handful of people from Yahoo and Live. Maybe Google has the market on educated, affluent people with money to burn on luxury items.If Yahoo gets more search traffic than Google, tell me what I&#039;m doing wrong, because on a day Google sends me 600 people, I&#039;ll get 16 from Yahoo.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many people a day does Yahoo send you? Google?</p><p>Maybe it&#8217;s me, but my site and my friend JD&#8217;s site get a flood of people from Google, but only a handful of people from Yahoo and Live. Maybe Google has the market on educated, affluent people with money to burn on luxury items.</p><p>If Yahoo gets more search traffic than Google, tell me what I&#8217;m doing wrong, because on a day Google sends me 600 people, I&#8217;ll get 16 from Yahoo.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Everton</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-145095</link> <dc:creator>Everton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:14:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/#comment-145095</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/28/googles-market-share-grows-and-grows-and-grows/index.html?ex=1356930000&amp;en=cd10825cfa9cea38&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Market  share data&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/28/googles-market-share-grows-and-grows-and-grows/index.html?ex=1356930000&#038;en=cd10825cfa9cea38&#038;ei=5088&#038;partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss" rel="nofollow">Market  share data</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark from Bloglyne</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-145093</link> <dc:creator>Mark from Bloglyne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:57:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/#comment-145093</guid> <description>Taps for Google...???@mlankton - where are you getting your stats?  According to the stuff I&#039;m looking at Google trades places up &amp; down with Yahoo, and MSN is about two-thirds the volume of both of them - the way I see it this would dominate Google by about 30% - 35%Really interesting move by Microsoft (not saying this is a good thing, just interesting...)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taps for Google&#8230;???</p><p>@mlankton &#8211; where are you getting your stats?  According to the stuff I&#8217;m looking at Google trades places up &amp; down with Yahoo, and MSN is about two-thirds the volume of both of them &#8211; the way I see it this would dominate Google by about 30% &#8211; 35%</p><p>Really interesting move by Microsoft (not saying this is a good thing, just interesting&#8230;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mlankton</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-145090</link> <dc:creator>mlankton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:35:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/#comment-145090</guid> <description>MSN and Yahoo account for a pretty small percentage of search engine users compared to Google. Is Microsoft so interested in Yahoo&#039;s portal that they think it&#039;s worth that much? It is still the most trafficked site on the web, but $44B?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSN and Yahoo account for a pretty small percentage of search engine users compared to Google. Is Microsoft so interested in Yahoo&#8217;s portal that they think it&#8217;s worth that much? It is still the most trafficked site on the web, but $44B?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Watch hindi movies</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-145089</link> <dc:creator>Watch hindi movies</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:29:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2008/02/01/breaking-news-microsoft-bids-446bn-for-yahoo/#comment-145089</guid> <description>OMG google s position as search engine master will be challengedif that happens  have to switch to some chinese search engine (baidu or whatever) instead of MSN</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG<br /> google s position as search engine master will be challenged</p><p>if that happens  have to switch to some chinese search engine (baidu or whatever) instead of MSN</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/23 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn2.connectedinternet.co.uk

Served from: www.connectedinternet.co.uk @ 2010-03-21 16:29:35 -->