<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Last Bottleneck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/04/15/the-last-bottleneck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/04/15/the-last-bottleneck/</link>
	<description>Updated daily with the latest news, tips, tweaks, social networking, wordpress tips &#38; tweaks, windows optimization help and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:28:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: PPI Claims</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/04/15/the-last-bottleneck/comment-page-1/#comment-166937</link>
		<dc:creator>PPI Claims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/?p=5305#comment-166937</guid>
		<description>It looks like SSDs are v slowly becoming more affordable. The new OCZ Vertex 120GB SSD got a very very good review from Bit Tech.

Granted it is still £300+ to buy which is ridiculous but it offers better performance in every aspect compared to mechanical drives and is much cheaper than the Intel X25-M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like SSDs are v slowly becoming more affordable. The new OCZ Vertex 120GB SSD got a very very good review from Bit Tech.</p>
<p>Granted it is still £300+ to buy which is ridiculous but it offers better performance in every aspect compared to mechanical drives and is much cheaper than the Intel X25-M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lankton</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/04/15/the-last-bottleneck/comment-page-1/#comment-162466</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lankton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/?p=5305#comment-162466</guid>
		<description>Ok, added an identical WDC 320gb SATA drive and went raid0. Results of benchtest before and after:

sequential uncached write- 75.85mb/sec---&gt;150.89mb/sec
sequential uncached read- 73.75mb/sec---&gt;143.44mb/sec
random uncached write- 47.39mb/sec---&gt;87.47mb/sec
random uncached read- 28.12mb/sec---&gt;30.92mb/sec

Is the system blindingly faster than it was? Not really. Maybe shaved a second or two off the boot time. File copies are noticeably faster, and backup time is about an hour quicker than it was. Overall, a very nice $50 upgrade. Just make sure you have a good backup strategy in case a drive fails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, added an identical WDC 320gb SATA drive and went raid0. Results of benchtest before and after:</p>
<p>sequential uncached write- 75.85mb/sec&#8212;&gt;150.89mb/sec<br />
sequential uncached read- 73.75mb/sec&#8212;&gt;143.44mb/sec<br />
random uncached write- 47.39mb/sec&#8212;&gt;87.47mb/sec<br />
random uncached read- 28.12mb/sec&#8212;&gt;30.92mb/sec</p>
<p>Is the system blindingly faster than it was? Not really. Maybe shaved a second or two off the boot time. File copies are noticeably faster, and backup time is about an hour quicker than it was. Overall, a very nice $50 upgrade. Just make sure you have a good backup strategy in case a drive fails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob O.</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/04/15/the-last-bottleneck/comment-page-1/#comment-159497</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/?p=5305#comment-159497</guid>
		<description>Three additional (and significant) benefits to SSD storage are reduced noise, heat, and power consumption.  These are already becoming de facto storage in &lt;a href=&quot;http://jkontherun.com/category/netbooks/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;netbooks&lt;/a&gt; where volume of storage is much less of a concern and power consumption &amp; weight are paramount.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three additional (and significant) benefits to SSD storage are reduced noise, heat, and power consumption.  These are already becoming de facto storage in <a href="http://jkontherun.com/category/netbooks/" rel="nofollow">netbooks</a> where volume of storage is much less of a concern and power consumption &amp; weight are paramount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Real Claims</title>
		<link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/04/15/the-last-bottleneck/comment-page-1/#comment-158153</link>
		<dc:creator>Real Claims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/?p=5305#comment-158153</guid>
		<description>I think that without a doubt SSDs are the way of the future. They quickly gaining size, falling in cost and improving on the issues with write speed.

Granted they are still some way off becoming affordable for the average user, but the cost per gig has fallen substantially over the past couple of years.

I believe the issues with write speed are slowly becoming a thing of the past by using dual drive controller chips (and probably more in the future)

Unfortunately I haven’t had the pleasure of using SSD yet, but hopefully I will upgrade next year when it is a little more affordable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that without a doubt SSDs are the way of the future. They quickly gaining size, falling in cost and improving on the issues with write speed.</p>
<p>Granted they are still some way off becoming affordable for the average user, but the cost per gig has fallen substantially over the past couple of years.</p>
<p>I believe the issues with write speed are slowly becoming a thing of the past by using dual drive controller chips (and probably more in the future)</p>
<p>Unfortunately I haven’t had the pleasure of using SSD yet, but hopefully I will upgrade next year when it is a little more affordable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 1/12 queries in 0.005 seconds using apc
Object Caching 331/407 objects using apc

Served from: www.connectedinternet.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 09:28:10 -->
