OpenOffice.org vs Google Docs
Michael Lankton | Jun 29, 2009 | Comments
Microsoft Office has ruled the world of computer productivity since the Windows 9x era. Really, how many of you are still using Corel or Lotus? I thought so.
While non-Windows hardware represents a very small slice of the pie, it’s still a factor because in a perfect world we would all be using the same apps for productivity regardless of platform, and standards would be usable across platforms.
Office does have a Mac port, and while it’s incomplete (no Access), it does allow users to have the exact same environment on Windows and OS X, with documents that work on both systems.
What about the rest of the world? While you can run Windows and Office in a virtual machine, until fairly recently this wasn’t such a good option because our hardware wasn’t up to the task of running emulated hardware with near native speed. On top of that, now you need A) a Windows DVD, B) an Office DVD and C) virtual machine software to run them. Not the most seemless solution for enterprise or Joe User.
I played with StarOffice a long time ago, and didn’t spend too much time with it due to it’s immature state. I revisited early this spring when I tried OpenOffice.org, and found that it’s feature set had come along swimmingly, and I switched from MS Office to OpenOffice.org. I like that OpenOffice.org does a decent job with MS Office documents. I like that it runs on many platforms, so that whether I’m on the Mac, using Windows, or running the unix flavor of the month, I have the exact same work environment. Besides lacking ports to Amiga OS 4 and MorphOS, OpenOffice.org pretty much covers all the hardware bases.
With MS Office, you’re looking at approximately $300 for the full version, and I don’t know what licenses cost businesses. That, or you’re stealing to use it.
OpenOffice.org is free. Free as in free. You’re not paying a dime, or breaking any laws to use it.
I have been so impressed with OpenOffice.org that I have said something I wouldn’t have thought five years ago: I believe that OpenOffice will eventually replace MS Office as the productivity suite standard, and that’s a Good Thing.
The alternative is Google docs. Think Office minus Access, except as a web app. Google docs is in its infancy, but I can see it progressing to the point that it’s as full featured as you’d need it to be. I have never been a believer that online apps would replace compiled apps, and that eventually we’d all be using dumb terminals at home. However, I can see the benefit of Google docs. No matter what piece of hardware you are on, with a compatible web browser you have the same productivity environment.
My personal feeling is that people like a sense of tangibility that web apps don’t provide, and I think that OpenOffice would become people’s preference over Google docs.
What do you think?
Read Related Posts
Filed Under: Misc
About the Author: Have you been a bass player in a hardcore punk band? Built stroker Harleys? Have you been in a fight this month? Written an article about SEO that somehow managed to turn into a social commentary editorial?Mike has.Since 2007 Mike has been sharing his unique worldview with Connected Internet readers. Stop back to see what Mike is thinking about next week.
- Free Sony Vaio Laptop
- Best CSS Gallery
- Lame Name for a User
- Didos
- Michael Lankton
- Simon West
- Neill Harris
- Gareth S Price
- David Legg
- Jesse Zylstra
Why 2009 Was The Year I Broke Down And Sold My Soul To Google
Google Chrome OS Poll: Could You Survive With A Webcentric OS?
eOffice 4.7 for BlackBerry offers unlimited online storage



