<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Please Don&#8217;t Screw Up HTML 5</title> <atom:link href="http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/06/30/please-dont-screw-up-html-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/06/30/please-dont-screw-up-html-5/</link> <description>The latest tech, mobile and gaming news</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:58:18 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: fun games for kids</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/06/30/please-dont-screw-up-html-5/comment-page-1/#comment-171570</link> <dc:creator>fun games for kids</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 03:03:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/?p=6115#comment-171570</guid> <description>Hahaha.. I like this one. Firefox rocks, I mean the plugins rocks :)IE is a big pain for web developer...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha.. I like this one. Firefox rocks, I mean the plugins rocks :)</p><p>IE is a big pain for web developer&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: j_chi</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/06/30/please-dont-screw-up-html-5/comment-page-1/#comment-169201</link> <dc:creator>j_chi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:12:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/?p=6115#comment-169201</guid> <description>If html5 is developed with a plug-in option then it won&#039;t be held back by any one browser holdout. So if firefox / chrome bake the standard into their browser and ie / safari don&#039;t users could just add the html5 plug-in to those other browsers. Thereby having the same user experience across all platforms as java does now. This should also speed up adoption significantly.Just an idea.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If html5 is developed with a plug-in option then it won&#8217;t be held back by any one browser holdout. So if firefox / chrome bake the standard into their browser and ie / safari don&#8217;t users could just add the html5 plug-in to those other browsers. Thereby having the same user experience across all platforms as java does now. This should also speed up adoption significantly.</p><p>Just an idea.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Lankton</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/06/30/please-dont-screw-up-html-5/comment-page-1/#comment-169198</link> <dc:creator>Michael Lankton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:31:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/?p=6115#comment-169198</guid> <description>The job of a web browser is to render html into something that we can read. There are standards for the various flavors of html, and web designers make their pages based on these standards. If your web browser does not comply to the html standard, you are not seeing what the web designer intended you to see. Therefore, yes IE is crap. It is not standards compliant. Much of the web is broken in IE. Everyone would be much better off using a Mozilla or Webkit-based browser, and there are many to choose from.    </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The job of a web browser is to render html into something that we can read. There are standards for the various flavors of html, and web designers make their pages based on these standards. If your web browser does not comply to the html standard, you are not seeing what the web designer intended you to see.<br /> Therefore, yes IE is crap. It is not standards compliant. Much of the web is broken in IE. Everyone would be much better off using a Mozilla or Webkit-based browser, and there are many to choose from.<br />  <br />  </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: notboss</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/06/30/please-dont-screw-up-html-5/comment-page-1/#comment-169194</link> <dc:creator>notboss</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:10:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/?p=6115#comment-169194</guid> <description>You wrote: &quot;People in the workplace are still going to be screwed.&quot;   Not really. Some employees aren&#039;t supposed to be watching video on their secure corporate machines, but many others have Flash at work and can watch video. Adobe licensed the right to decode H.264 in Flash so H.264 has become something of a Web standard for high quality video despite its cost. Something like 80% of (non-mobile) Web video is displayed in Flash. And it works reasonably well across operating systems and very well on Windows. HTML 5 is a great idea, but why bash Flash while we wait to see what Microsoft and others do with the HTML 5 draft proposal? The evolution of the Web isn&#039;t a winner-take-all sporting event. It&#039;s not like the desktop operating system market of the 80 and 90s.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wrote: &#8220;People in the workplace are still going to be screwed.&#8221;<br />  <br /> Not really. Some employees aren&#8217;t supposed to be watching video on their secure corporate machines, but many others have Flash at work and can watch video. Adobe licensed the right to decode H.264 in Flash so H.264 has become something of a Web standard for high quality video despite its cost. Something like 80% of (non-mobile) Web video is displayed in Flash. And it works reasonably well across operating systems and very well on Windows. HTML 5 is a great idea, but why bash Flash while we wait to see what Microsoft and others do with the HTML 5 draft proposal? The evolution of the Web isn&#8217;t a winner-take-all sporting event. It&#8217;s not like the desktop operating system market of the 80 and 90s.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Best CSS Gallery</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/06/30/please-dont-screw-up-html-5/comment-page-1/#comment-169187</link> <dc:creator>Best CSS Gallery</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:55:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/?p=6115#comment-169187</guid> <description>I asume you don&#039;t like Flash at all :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I asume you don&#8217;t like Flash at all :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Free XBox 360 Elite</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/06/30/please-dont-screw-up-html-5/comment-page-1/#comment-169183</link> <dc:creator>Free XBox 360 Elite</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:10:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/?p=6115#comment-169183</guid> <description>So in order to get the best web experience we need to stop using IE and switch to Firefox?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So in order to get the best web experience we need to stop using IE and switch to Firefox?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Lankton</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/06/30/please-dont-screw-up-html-5/comment-page-1/#comment-169175</link> <dc:creator>Michael Lankton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:25:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/?p=6115#comment-169175</guid> <description>Exactly, and a big oversight on my part. IE8 is not supposed to support the video tag, and why would they?People in the workplace are still going to be screwed, whether Mozilla and Webkit are standards compliant or not, because most of them will be stuck with IE.:(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, and a big oversight on my part. IE8 is not supposed to support the video tag, and why would they?</p><p>People in the workplace are still going to be screwed, whether Mozilla and Webkit are standards compliant or not, because most of them will be stuck with IE.</p><p>:(</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: notboss</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/06/30/please-dont-screw-up-html-5/comment-page-1/#comment-169174</link> <dc:creator>notboss</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:32:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/?p=6115#comment-169174</guid> <description>You wrote: &quot;Maybe you’re using a computer you don’t own or have the ability to install software on... What if the site you need to get on requires Flash and you don’t have it?&quot;It is much more likely in a corporate or other institutional environments that you will be using IE with Flash than Firefox 3.5 or Safari. That&#039;s just the way it is.Asking people not to author in Flash isn&#039;t going to make a difference as long as HTML 5 is not available on the vast majority of installed browsers. On the other hand, if you can convince Microsoft to implement HTML 5 in their next browser, that would make a big difference about five years after they finally release it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wrote: &#8220;Maybe you’re using a computer you don’t own or have the ability to install software on&#8230; What if the site you need to get on requires Flash and you don’t have it?&#8221;</p><p>It is much more likely in a corporate or other institutional environments that you will be using IE with Flash than Firefox 3.5 or Safari. That&#8217;s just the way it is.</p><p>Asking people not to author in Flash isn&#8217;t going to make a difference as long as HTML 5 is not available on the vast majority of installed browsers. On the other hand, if you can convince Microsoft to implement HTML 5 in their next browser, that would make a big difference about five years after they finally release it.</p><p> </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christopher</title><link>http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/2009/06/30/please-dont-screw-up-html-5/comment-page-1/#comment-169169</link> <dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:01:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/?p=6115#comment-169169</guid> <description>Aww, noooo</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww, noooo</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/20 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn2.connectedinternet.co.uk

Served from: www.connectedinternet.co.uk @ 2010-03-22 13:34:07 -->